Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 15:09:09 -0400
From: "G. Irvine" <gmirvine@sa*.ne*>
Organization: Woodville Karst Plain Project
To: Jeremy Downs <dcrco@jp*.ne*>
CC: "Ocean Diving Inc." <divetek@ic*.ne*>,
     deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*, rebreather@nw*.co*,
     Shadowdivr@ao*.co*
Subject: Re: Whos misleading who? (was IANTD's standards)
This is a little nuts, obviously, and makes our point - NOBODY is
beeihng fooled by the strokes anymore, and even the instructors can not
explain the "standards". 

Jeremy Downs wrote:
> 
> I included your last three posts so this will makes sense.
> 
> >At 01:00 PM 9/5/97 -0400, Ocean Diving Inc. wrote:
> >Jer,
> >Did you know that the Max. depth limit for IANTD
> >Deep Air Training is 130'. Sounds like somebody is feeding you a lot of
> >bull. I will gladly send you a copy of the Deep Air Course S&P's for your
> >eval if you would like. Don't be mislead. Lead.
> >Semper Deep
> >Capt. Jim
> 
> We were talking about deep air in general, not one of several classes
> working the students into more and more dangerous situations before they can
> get to the classes they need. Don't miss the piont because of a
> technicality. For this discussion lets remember were talking about it's use
> below 130'.
> 
> At 08:57 AM 9/6/97 -0400, Ocean Diving Inc. wrote:
> >Get Real,
> >When you try to compare Advanced Deep Air diver training with Deep Air
> Training you are comparing a 160' experience with a 130' expierience. I'll
> bet you don't get as narced at 160' as you have seen others Right.
> 
> You never know if your going to get hit harder or not. Its allways a little
> different each time. Murphy's law can really go to work on this one. The one
> time you or your students really need a clear head will be the time tou
> don't have one. Theres also alot of speculation now that high PPO2s may be
> doing more than just narcing us, it may be doing physical damage as well.
> 
> >I've been teaching CMAS depths for over 23 years but I don't think 190' air
> dives are very proper
> 
> Your right, so why do it, why require it?
> 
> >Anyone that does not offer Intermediate Trimix to a student diver that
> wants to go beyond 130' after completing Deep Air training is missing the
boat.
> >By the way, it is our policy to "provide" not "promote"
> >Diver training. When you promote, you are bound to get the most undesirable.
> 
> By requiring these classes to progress up to classes the that are useful is
> promoting them. Besides in teaching them your saying that its ok, its not.
> Even your logo promotes it right across the bottom and we all know its
> talking about deep air in general.
> 
> At 09:10 AM 9/6/97 -0400, Ocean Diving Inc. wrote:
> >Hey Jer,
> >IANTD offers courses other than Deep Air(130' max).
> >One is called Advanced Deep Air (160' max) and should be refered to as so.
> I know that you understand the difference. The Technical Deep Air program
> (190' max)
> >Was allowed due to a great demand by the European Tech diving Community as
> helium is difficult and/or too
> >Expensive to obtain in some nations.
> 
> Its not a problem here in the western hemisphere so why promote it here? In
> fact yours is a US founded and based agency plus most of its students are in
> this part of the world are they not? Its not allowed, its required.
> 
> >The grouping of all training into one name"Deep Air" is an injustice. Like
> >Calling Divemaster training "Open Water Diver" training.
> >There is a difference in each course and each yields a more competent diver
> and Trimix divers deserve to have the best training foundation possible.
> Sounds like you have a local problem with one who wants to avoid training
> Intermediate Trimix to his/her Deep Air/Advanced Deep Air grads. We don't
> hesitate.
> >Jim
> 
> You can call the courses what you want, I dont care. I'm concerned with the
> principals involved. Maybe you should reread my posts all the way back to
> the original one on this thread. Your completely missing my point,
> completely. My post was talking about several problems including promoting
> deep air, standards on rebreather instructor requirements not being enforced
> on all instructors the same way, excessive course structure, insulting fees,
> etc. I was also saying some of the same things about TDI even though IANTD
> seems to be the biggest problem.
> 
> >
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]