Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:13:44 -0700
From: breazile@ne*.co* (Jon Breazile)
To: s_lindblom@co*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Oxygen Sensors
Steve Lindblom Wrote:
>Had an interesting talk with a Cerametec rep the other day. Cerametec
>(1-800-748-5355) manufacturers a variety of O2 sensors, and their CAG 250
>sensor has been mentioned in the OXYGEN HACKER book
>(www.conknet.com/~g_packard/oxyhacker.html) and on Roger Lacasse's great
>DIY gear page as a cheaper, longer life sensor. I think this is the
>industrial sensor that was mentioned here awhile back.
>
>The rep told me that there is no difference in quality between the med and
>ind. sensors - bascically, it's the same unit, only the med one is
>"optimized" for mixes towards 100% and the industrial one for mixed gases
>in the 0-60% range even though both are rated for use from 0 to 100%.
>This sensor goes for $50 or $65, depending on whether you buy it as an
>individual, or have a biz name and can convince them it's for resale. It's
>rated for 900,000 02% hours, as compared to 750.000 for the Miniox (though
>this probably doesn't accurately reflect the service life, and various
>vendors of this sensor are claiming it will last 4-5 years in typical
>dive/nitrox service, compared with 1-2 for the Miniox).
>There's a screw on hose adaptor available for it, for about $5 extra.
>
>Most interesting, if one has any lingering doubts about using an
>"industrial" sensor, is that he said they are all of a sudden selling a
>heck of a lot of them these days to the dive industry - he knew what I was
>talkin about the second I mentioned nitrox - and said that that my Pequot
>was probably a relabled Cerametec, and hinted that Scubapro, OMS and
>Oceanic are also using the same unit.
>
>I've been using a Pequot all summer, and have been very happy with its
>stability - unlike the Mini, it doesn't seem to give a damn about flow
>rates or movement - which the Cerametec rep said is characteristic of their
>unit. It has a hose connection on it, and I have found that I get exactly
>the same result whether I use a med. flow gauge/reg sampler, or just hold
>the sensor up to the hole in the valve, as G3 suggested here a while back.

I have had good results with this sensor. I have used it with a  MiniOx
unit, and it is stable even when you shake the sensor around (it uses a
gel electrolite). The only problem is wiring it. They have 3 wiring
versions of this sensor: 1) a Molex connector, 2) wires coming out the top,
3) a screw on plug (different than the MiniOx). I had to make a converter
cable to make it work with the MiniOx.

-Jon
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]