Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 16:48:58 -0400
From: George Irvine <gmirvine@sa*.ne*>
Organization: Woodville Karst Plain Project
To: Wrolf.Courtney@do*.co*
CC: Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com
Subject: Re: Palmer, Parker, Exley and McFaden
Wrolf, you have all the answers, right? You tell us what the right
depth is for air - go ahead - tell us what is the depth for which air is
the correct mix using any set of standards or logic you can think of.
Let's hear it, Rolf, you can not hide behind anything else - thre is no
bad language here, there is no attack - just you and you can now tell us
all the depth. What is the perfect depth for this gas, and why?

Wrolf.Courtney@do*.co* wrote:
> 
> How deep is too deep for air?
> 
> Your votes for the following extremist positions please.  Flames to
> /dev/null.
> 
> (Or if you are new to the net, please try a 100' deco stop on 100% Ar
> before sending insults,
> ad hominem attacks, or language that would embarass your mother.)
> 
> a) 130'
> b) 165'
> c) 180'
> d) 218'
> e) 60'
> 
> I have seen all of these advocated passionately and intelligently.  Of
> course, the 60' limit was (is?) advocated generally by the passionate
> devotees of SafeAir.
> 
> Wrolf
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]