Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Message Display

I did not misunderstand Ingemar - what I do not understand is why there
are idiots out there teaching this kind of thing. I have seen no
software that accounts for the real shape of decompression, but then
ther is no one model that does it. You have to combine moddels, and some
of them do not lend themselves to computer interpretation. For
simplicity , I would run a Bulhman with zero "safety" factors and
combine that result with deeper stops without telling the model you are
doing that. Check the deep stops separately using the model to see how
much they are moving your ceiling, and reset for different guesses until
you see the pattern working properly - at least that is close to
reality. We have always had to "trick" the deco programs to get anything
that approaches what we already know works.

  This will not hurt you , and it will work a lot better than the model
itself. You will basicly end up with a relatively short, but multi-stop
deco.

Sigmund Lundgren wrote:
> 
> George,
> 
>         It's obvious that you missunderstood Ingemar, he just wanted you to
> confirm what you said before. This is a really interesting issue. I guess
> he wanted something more concrete. His question was: are there any deco
> software that takes your findings in consideration? What software if any do
> you use? I guess we are among the few that are openminded and are willing
> to listen actually - we are not blinded by the strokes out there.
> 
> /Sigmund
> 
> >
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]