Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <gmirvine@sa*.ne*>
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 16:01:23 -0400
To: Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>
CC: cavers@ge*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Standards, Deep Air, Narcotic Mixes - Three Wedings and a few Funerals
Tom, forgetting for a moment the dichotomy of the standards ( 130 for
mix, 180 for eanx), why do I need to come to you to dive deep on air? I
can do that myself.

 Another question - why is this being called "technical diving", and
since when do the students make the standards. Tom, we have some
seriously flawed logic in all of this - you are the boss, you should be
setting the pace.


Tom Mount wrote:
> 
> gmirvine@sa*.ne* wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ---Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >          If this is so safe, then why are a disproportionate number of
> > cave divng accidents amoung trained divers below 130 , and why are a
> > disproportionate number of ocean diving accidents below 130?
> 
> Most of these are deeper than 180 feet, again see our standards post
> >
> >
> >          The concept that there is such a thing as "ability to handle
> > impairment" is fundamentallly flawed. Your "standards" need changing, in
> > my opinion. - GGeorge, you are entitled to your opnions, and we are to ours
> Internationally almost all countries have endorsed 50m, it has a proven
> record. We have to fight to get the general population to settle for our
> limits. Most divers on the US coast do dive deep and we are slowly
> educating them away from 200+ on air.
> Again, these are and will remain our standards
> Tom
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]