Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Re: Lawyers - solo diving
Date: Thu, 22 May 97 13:37:05 -0400
From: Jim Cobb <cobber@mi*.co*>
To: "Doug Chapman" <doug@su*.ne*>, "Tech Diver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
cc: <cavers@aq*.co*>
I really shouldn't rag on asshole blood-sucking lawyers so much, after 
all they are on my side on the issue of solo diving. In the latest 
Rondales there is an incident where an inexperienced diver got left 
behind by her "buddies" and, for some reason, croaked.

The dead persons' family then sued the state (it was a shore dive), the 
land owner, the equipment companies, the equipment rental companies, 
"several john doe's" (those wacky lawyers sure like to keep all bases 
covered, don't they?) and the dive buddies.

Of course understand that the dead girl's family was not gold-digging, 
they were emotionally distraught and, Thank God, there were some 
ambulance-chasers around to assist them in their time of need.

Turns out that the only case which stuck was against the dive buddies, 
who settled out of court with the "sewers" shysters for an undisclosed 
amount.

So, the next time dive boat tries to foist a moron on you as your "dive 
buddy", just tell him/her "Hell, no! My insurance doesn't cover a dive 
buddy". That ought to get everybody's head spinning.

   Jim

On 5/22/97 7:46 AM Doug Chapman wrote:

>While I was a member of a Diving Safety Board at a university a few years
>ago. the issue of the legality of administering pure oxygen (in Florida) to
>a diver with injury (bends or embolism) by an uncertified individual (e.g.
>not a paramedic) was brought up. My opinion was simple - I don't care as
>long as it is not done using forced ventilation. However the Diving Officer
>went off to the insurance company and their lawyers, and the following
>response was returned. We (the insurance company) believe the hazards of
>administering pure oxygen to a diver with illness is greater than the
>potential hazards of getting the bends or embolizing with dives of 100ft or
>shallower (the university limited dives to 100ft or shallower). Therefore
>you (the university) should not require and use O2 on site during diving
>operations for a diving emergency. 
>
>If the subject was not serious, the letter from the insurance company would
>have been considered a joke. We need to be careful what these lawyers and
>experts feed us because in most cases they don't have the slightest clue.
>
>Think about it the next time a lawyer gives you advice,
>
>Doug Chapman
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]