Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: Michel Therrien <m.therrien@ne*.qc*.ca*>
From: armantrout@wo*.at*.ne* (Jesse Armantrout)
Subject: Re: Get a clue; No more deep air!
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com, "Ted Green" <scuba@md*.co*>
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 12:37:27 +0000
Thankyou for this info.  I have moved 3 times this year and TDI is having
trouble getting stuff to me.  This appears correct, as others have posted
same.  I guess I am out of standards.  I guess I will have to stop teaching
all together.  Darn.  Just when i was getting rich. Not!

Trout

At 07:09 PM 5/13/97 +0000, Michel Therrien wrote:
>There are some changes in the TDI standards for 1997.
>
>For instance, the maximum training depth for the extended range diving
>course is now 218 fsw.  6 dives totalling at least 100 minutes of bottom
>time are required as follows:
>
>. all must be deeper than 100 fsw
>. 2 must be deeper than 130 fsw
>. 2 must be deeper than 160 fsw
>. no more than 2 dives may be credited from previous diving
>
>The course can no longer be teached w/o exceeding 130 fsw.
>
>Other changes affect the depth limitation for the staged decompression and
>advanced nitrox programs.  The max depth used to be 160 fsw.  Now it is 130
>fsw.  It leaves a gap of nearly 90 feet between advanced nitrox and
>extended range (I personally do not support such a big gap - I don't
>support air training at 218 feet either BTW).
>
>Michel Therrien
>
>
>
>At 09:18 PM 5/13/97 +0000, Jesse Armantrout wrote:
>>Ted,
>>You obviously don't have a clue.  It's ok.  Most of us don't, or at least
>>didn't at one time.  We've been sucked in by the hype and macho attitudes
>>that have been presented in the tech magazines, at the tech conferences and
>>from the tech agencies.  There is no reason to plan deep dives on air.
>>Period.  Teaching deep air to 200 is insane.
>>
>>You need to reread the standards.  Nowhere does it say you have to take
>>people to 200.  It just defines a max, no min.  Per TDI standards (1996
>>version...sorry I do not have the 1997 with me but I think it is the same)
>>the TDI extended range diver course, formerly called Technical Deep Air, can
>>be taught without exceeding 130 fsw.
>>
>>When I took my trimix course, we were encouraged to run END's as high as
>>possible based on our performance in our deep air course.  If we handled 200
>>in deep air, 175 was END for trimix.  We were taught to fear helium.  Why?
>>We did not understand it.  Helium is your friend.  Take advantage of it.
>>Make your students plan END's of 130, po2's of 1.4 MAX regardless of the
>>course.  Tom Mount, Bret Gilliam, tell us why we should be teaching air
>>below 130?  Anybody?
>>
>>As for George, well, yeah he is an asshole, God Bless Him.  If not for him,
>>I would probably be as dead as Rob.  I too was riding the deep air train to
>>hell.  I liked the buzz.  I admit it.  My comfort zone was up to 300.  What
>>a fucking joke.  Now I dread going back onto air for deco after a mixed gas
>>dive.  If the worst gmi does is dispenses info that saves lives while coming
>>across as a jerk who can't spell is that so bad?
>>
>>As for comparing gmi pushing the envelope with what Rob did, well I am sure
>>that we do not need to rehash that except to say the former is doing
>>dangerous dives as safely as possible while the later just makes no sense.
>>
>>Think about it, buddy.  You will come up with the rigt answers yourself.
>>
>>Trout
>>
>>"Stupidity is often self-correcting"
>>
>>--
>>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>>Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>>
>>
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]