Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 22:29:04 GMT
From: Paul Chapman <paul@de*.de*.co*.uk*>
To: pharris@cr*.pl*.uk*
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Manifolds
Paul H...

I think my latest message to you was private so we may have confused a few list 
subscribers, but that's easily done anyway :)

Briefly, for those who care, my message concerned the apparent lack of 
availability of a decent 300 bar DIN isolator manifold in the UK, despite the 
fact that the acknowledged dogs bollocks in the US (Scubapro/Dive Rite/Sea Tec) 
is actually made on our side of the pond (Switzerland? - thanks to Philip 
Underhill for that info, I'll be checking tomorrow).

I'm not aware of a proper UK source for the OMS (valve threads are the problem 
here) but if it does use face seals it's crap anyway. The orientation of the
DIN 
valve fittings is at 90 degrees to your normal direction of travel, so they're 
not subject to the turning effect on impact and also not as exposed as the 
isolator valve. Remember also that loss of the valve-manifold joint means 
goodbye to half your remaining gas. A fucked valve-first stage joint means 
shutting down the reg, but the gas is preserved. This is a vital distinction
and 
the whole point of diving a manifold in the first place, otherwise you may as 
well have independants and save yourself the expense (your family will need it 
for the funeral).

Independants are wrong, but so is a duff manifold. Discussing degrees of wrong 
is pointless. Scubapro & Dive Rite don't have the 300 bar; the MDE is a joke, a 
five (yes five) piece manifold? Please. Apeks is just close, but no cigar. OMS
- 
face seals, no thanks. Somebody tell me those damm yankees don't do it better 
than us :)

See you

Paul C (the Brits are coming...well soon anyway...if it's OK with y'all)


In your message dated Friday 18, April 1997 you wrote :
> Further to Paul Chapmans' earlier message re: manifolds and the limited =
> options over here in the UK.> What are the relative merits of the OMS 
manifold?
> It appears to have facing o-rings but the blurb says that they are =
> captive like a DIN fitting and therefore a 'superior method in =
> preventing O-ring extrusion'
> It certainly seems a bit more solid than the Apeks ( even the 300 bar =
> version), which has single barrel o-rings and has a lot less joins than =
> the MDE.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]