Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 18:04:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Favorite <rwfavorite@uc*.ed*>
To: Art Greenberg <artg@ec*.ne*>
cc: Bob Favorite <rwfavorite@uc*.ed*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Steel vs. Aluminum for O2 Cylinders
On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, Art Greenberg wrote:
> 
> - Is there a rule of thumb (or anything more precise than that) that says
> how long a steel cylinder can be used for O2 service? (IOW, what's the
> expected lifetime in O2 service vs. expected lifetime in air or other low
> PPO2 service?)

I don't know of one.

> - Does this imply that steel cylinders used for O2 should be inspected more
> frequently than once per year?

I doubt that it would be nescessary.  As long as the gas is dry and the
cylinder isn't drained I don't think it would rust that fast.

> - Since the rate of oxidation is related to PPO2, would it be wise to drain
> down and fill steel cylinders used for O2 service with OCA or any other
> suitable low PPO2 mix when not in use for a while?

Maybe not a bad idea.  My nitrox instructor said that any steel nitrox
cylinders should be analyzed within 24 hrs of use to eliminate the risk of
a change in pO2 due to oxidation.

> - Does the way aluminum behaves imply that it's a bad idea to tumble   
> aluminum cylinders used for O2 service?

If a cylinder needs a tumble to allow a good inspection then it should be
tumbled.  The layer of oxidation on an Al cylinder is pretty thin anyway.

  ooooO         Bob        
 (    )   Ooooo    Favorite              
  \  (   (    )            RVT        
   \  )   )  /                
         (  /

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]