4:12 PM OFFICE MEMO Time: Subject: None 7/5/94 Date: tbengtson@VN*.IB*.CO* (Tim Bengtson) wrote: >As I recall, the device in question was designed to breathe very hard >if the user got below the designed operating floor. Granted, this is >no guarantee that a determined user couldn't find a way to hurt himself >with the rebreather, but it sounded like the manufacturer took CNS O2 >tox into account. Yes, the manufacturer did try to limit the ability of people using this to *experience* O2 toxicity. They set up the rebreather to work at 80 percent O2 (PPO2 of 1.6 at 33 ft). But it (IMHO) would be real easy to go deeper than that. > Because the flexible tubing expanded and contracted >with the user's breathing, I noticed that everyone seemed to breathe >in quick, shallow breaths, although it's not possible to know whether >that was because of some inherent design flaw or simply nervous >divers. As for hard to breath, I wonder if the people using this device get CO2 hits (making O2 toxicity MORE likely)? >Ten minutes at fifteen feet definitely puts this thing into the toy >category but for its price... 800 USD. That's one of my biggest >problems with the show "Beyond 2000"; more often than not, they trot >out gadgets that are impossibly impractical, gush over them for five >or ten minutes, and then say "Gee whiz" at the end. Gag. Oh well... which one of DOESN*T have some expensive toys? >Tim Steve
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]