Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
> Richie, obvously I wil continue to do waht works, but now I know why it works > from several different angles. We do this constantly over a long time frame. We > are geting into semantics here. When I get bent, then I will say I do not know > hat works, because that wilbe the proof. Closing in on 1000 serious deco dives, > Richie, and looking good. O.K., it sounds like we're talking the same language now. Maybe its semantics - my point was that you DO know *what* works, but I don't think any of us can really say *why* what we do works (from a physiological/molecular perspective). > elements I believe in: 1) no PFO, 2) no fat slobbery, 3) top physical > conditioning, 4) and a proper deco of the tyope we have talked about due to > tissue theroy and bubble theroy , are what works. Remmeber, they knew about tar > casusing cancer before they could prove it and now they can see benzo tyrene > mutate P53 - Richie - I went with the "cigarettes cause cancer" a long time ago, > and do not need a bunch of amamtuers or even pros who will not commit telling me > how to bet my life - obvious is obvious, and we are obviously doing it right. All I'm saying is that yes, the value of the deep stops is obvious. Whether or not bubble physics has anything to do with why they work is still up in the air. > The best part of it is that anyone who might evr get into a position to test > this theory will never have the balls to do it ( 155 minute at 300 with 8.5 > deco? - NEVER) . - G You obviously are in a position to test it for your profiles. But I gotta tell you, if the bubble stuff is right, then the deep stops are much MORE important on the bounce dives than on the near saturation dives. Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]