Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 14:56:36 +0200
From: Philippe VILLARD <philippe.villard@rp*.fr*>
Organization: Rhtne-Poulenc Ind / CRIT.
To: techdiver@terra.net
Cc: gmiiii@in*.co*
Subject: Re: To Bridge or not too....
You wrote:
> [cut]
>    The real problem is that no one model accounts properly for deco, so I have
> to use DECOM  and one other method, and or get Bill Hamilton to work out a

Could you tell us what's the "one other method" ?

> schedule for me based on feedback I have already given him for years. Combine
> this with the fact that most manufacturers are so scared of liablilty, that
they
> pad the aglorithm and end up with something that asks for too much deco, and

Have you ever heard of a manufacturer actually held liable for that ?

> ...
> computer had some other predispositon, usually a PFO, yet in this country,
fear
> of litigation where the simple minded can win, as in a suit over too little
> deco, is easier to argue to idoits than one of for too much deco, although a
> good expert could prove it.

Anyway, this is not a case of "right" vs "wrong" deco but rather a continuous
scale of increased *risk* of DCS. Different profiles will expose you to risks
of 1%, 5%, 10% ... based on a general statistical group.
Now the amount of risk you consider acceptable for yourself is of course your
own business, according to your kind of diving and the support you can get.

Manufacturers should print that risk level on the box, or at least
in the documentation. The trade-off here is obvious: people want a "safe" 
device, but divecomps that are too conservative don't sell well. Word
spreads that divecomp "XYZ" nails you forever at 3m, and that's it.

May be an adjustable risk factor is what you are asking for ?
   "Well, I feel great today, let's try 15% ",
   "Uh ? Then I'll go for 20, 'cause I ain't no <insert favorite personal
reference here>"

... :-)


> [cut]
> 
> George M. Irvine III
> DIR WKPP
> 1400 SE 11 ST Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316
> 954-493-6655 FAX 6698
> Email gmiiii@in*.co*

--- philippe.villard@rp*.fr*; 
"The only difference between      | All opinions expressed here are
 men and children is the cost     | my very own and do not (necessarily)
 of their toys".                  | reflect my employer's position.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]