Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <gmiiii@in*.co*>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 03:09:06 -0700
Subject: Re: To Bridge or not too....
To: tjm@ib*.ne*, techdiver@terra.net
Cc: cavers@ge*.co*

  If you guys read your own posts back and forth, your questions would be 
answered. Let me give you all one clue, since cluelessness is rampant on here:
I 
have no dive gear that has ever been returned, replaced, "fixed", swapped, 
upgraded, modified, or otherwise proven unreliable. 

  If you buy the right stuff to start with, none of this is a problem. Get a 
bottom timer and depth guage for $150, and a copy of DECOM software for $69. 
That is all you need for any dive. 

  None of these computers has anything even approximating the correct deco for 
any profile, and , as you can see, most of what we read on here involves the 
degree of unrealiability of these devices. Obvoius is obvious, or it should be.

  All of you must have some pretty sore heads by now - try taking the cotton
out 
of your ears, or just wait until it falls out from beating your heads against 
the wall. You guys must have either some serious big money to waste on
bullshit, 
or have spent so much money on trash that you have nothing left for the real 
good toys , like what you see us playing with.

  Is this starting to make any sense? For the price of a Bridge, Transformer 
Pack, Super Wings, MLS light and other atrocities that go with it, you could 
have a backplate, harness , wings, timer, and  Gavin scooter. Do you get it now?

  Does it not seem a little suspicious to all of you  that the source of the 
recommendation for all of your useless gear was a dive instructor who sells
this 
stuff? Are we getting through yet?  Let me ask you this: did you get the ginshu 
knives and the veggie steamer with this shit?


On Sat, 12 Oct 1996, <tjm@ib*.ne*> wrote:
>Hi Mitch,
>
>I've had a Bridge II since they first came out (actually I had a Bridge
>I that Dive Rite replaced with a II, at no cost).  I've had no problems
>at all with it.  It's simple, clear, and easy to use.
>

>T.J. 
>tjm@ib*.ne*
>
>
>chance@sn*.ne* wrote:
>> 
>> Hi again,
>> 
>> I'm looking seriously at the Bridge II computer.  Could anyone offer
>> some advice on it?  Anyone notice anything especially good or bad
>> about it?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Mitch
>> 
>> --

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]