Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 10:56:12 -0700
From: iantdhq@ix*.ne*.co* (IANTD )
Subject: Re: cc:Mail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
Cc: cavers@ge*.co*
Cc: techdiver@terra.net
The message below of course is a fake designed by some stroke who only 
knows how to play childish games just watch the routing on it
Tom

You wrote: 
>
>User NATHANEL_FUSTER@gu*.br*.af*.mi* is not defined
>           Original text follows 
>-----------------------------------------
>Received: by ccmail from zen.kr.com
>>From iantdhq@ix*.ne*.co*
>X-Envelope-From: iantdhq@ix*.ne*.co*
>Received: from wizard.pn.com (wizard.pn.com [204.96.36.2]) by 
zen.kr.com (SMI-8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA09016 for 
<cavers@ge*.co*>; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 22:19:43 -0400
>Received: from parnassus.pmail.gen.nz ([192.156.225.2]) by 
wizard.pn.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with SMTP id VAA07122 for 
<cavers@ge*.co*>; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 21:22:04 -0400
>Received: from urania.pmail.gen.nz (urania.pmail.gen.nz 
[192.156.225.16]) by parnassus.pmail.gen.nz (8.6.5/8.6.5) with ESMTP id 
OAA07005; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:19:41 +1200
>Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:19:41 +1200
>Received: from THALIA/SpoolDir by urania.pmail.gen.nz (Mercury 1.31);
>    9 Oct 96 13:36:18 +1100
>Received: from SpoolDir by THALIA (Mercury 1.31); 9 Oct 96 13:35:57 
+1100
>Received: from  by urania.pmail.gen.nz (Mercury 1.31);
>    9 Oct 96 13:35:37 +1100
>From: iantdhq@ix*.ne*.co* (IANTD )
>Subject: Private Re: DiveRite MLS info
>To: trout@mo*.gu*.ne* (Jesse Armantrout)
>Message-ID: <679A3857C21@ur*.pm*.ge*.nz*>
>
>
>You wrote: 
>>
>>173 minutes in Peacock????  My God, Tom, why not let your 
>students use fins, or at least a real light. I thought Dive
>Rite recalled that piece ofo shit weeks ago?
>
>
>At 11:14 AM 10/7/96 -0700, IANTD wrote:
>Trout,
>Why don't you kiss my ass? I swim with students, and 
>I do long dives with them and also swim relatively fast.
>They are not as fast as real divers, but they made it
>from Peacock to Olsen in 63 minutes on tripple stage.
>
>By the way, you guys hit it on the head with this
>light - what a problem. I thought the old one was
>bad, man you should see this mess. You are right ,
>they did recall it several times, but they keep coming
>up with a quick fix, just like the routine we went 
>through with the "Neutraleak". 
>
>I told them they need to ask a real engineer, or at 
>least somebody who knows something about diving, but
>they had already dreamed it up and "knew all the answers".
>Unbelieveable. If I were not in so deep with these
>idiots I would have  never let one in my house.
>
>Not only do they leak from every possible cause,
>you need a special tool to to get the lid off! They did
>not consider what happens when pressure, like from the
>hydrogen buildup  , increases on the inside. With a 
>proper light, like Arnold's, the o-ring would just 
>extrude if there were a propblem. But, NO, they listen 
>to some idiot who tells them to do this, and they end 
>up with a bomb. Whoever told them to use that seal did 
>not consider that these parts are molded, not machined.
>If one of these went off it would maim somebody, or brain
>damage them like must have happened to Mark Lenard . Ha!
>
>First, the fools tried to put the lid on while twisting 
>the wires - showing no forethought at all. The only "fore" 
>in this light is the "foreplay" Leonard must have had with 
>himself with this wet dream. They then came up with 
>something else, and something else and something else,
>until you need a set of "jaws of life" to put the thing
>together or take it apart. It is like an electric Rubic
>Cube that can not be unplugged with the lid on, so they 
>started handing out a second blank lid to put on when the 
>light is not in use. 
>
>They still have the fuse in there, causing the usual 
>problems and leaving me to suggest that nobody actually
>go into a cave with this light. 
>
>The molded-in belt loops are in the wrong places, just as 
>the d-rings on the Transpack are in the wrong places, 
>and they break off immediately when you try to use them.
>The light is huge, and takes up too much space to mount 
>properly , or improperly for that matter. The through hull
>connection is the usual crap, and is improperly mounted as
>well and in the wrong place. Switches? Foreget it - all
>of the same problems. Wiring ? Don't make me laugh. 
>Light head? The usual trash. 
>
>They were taking the old light in on trade plus cash for the
>new light - now I hear they are recommending you take the
>batteries out and send them along with a check to American
>Underwater Lighting and get a light you can dive with.
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]