Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 23:51:02 -0700
To: Dennis Pierce <dpierce@al*.ne*>
From: cherf@ci*.co* (Scott Cherf)
Subject: Re: 10 Best @ Rebreather 2.0
Cc: Peter Heseltine <heseltin@hs*.us*.ed*>,
Dennis -

Sorry to come in late on this, I've been up in Northern California
diving for large edible slugs for the past week.  We didn't use
rebreathers, in fact we didn't use anything (o.k. I used a snorkle,
so sue me).

While I was down there this past week I realized there's a scale
we can use to put things in perspective.  At the bottom of the scale is
what I was doing; you sit on the surface on top of an old truck inner tube
staring into the pea green water until your forhead gets so cold you
think you're going to die, then you hyperventilate like crazy, roll off the
inner tube and hope you find an abalone soon after you find the bottom.
This is level one; primitive diving.  Thank god the state of California
has preserved it by law.

Level two involves breathing compressed gas from a big cylinder on your
back (a Transportable Pressure Receptical).  This works much better, but
adds all sorts of risks due to the increased complexity of the breathing
apparatus, and the fact that if you're caught doing it while diving for
edible slugs the State will gleefully fine you $50,000 US and throw you in
prison for 3 years.

Level three involves using one of these darned rebreather thingamabobs.
They're great because you can get really close to the slugs without
alerting them to your presence, but again the State frowns on their use
(in this particular application) and will confiscate your rebreather unless
you also own a Mercedes.

The point here is that diving as we know it *is* technical.  There is only
one kind of *non* technical diving that I know of, and it involves using
a snorkel.  Been there, do that.

What I learned at the forum is that there's a new technology emerging.  It's
as revolutionary as SCUBA was in the 40's.  It's as *dangerous* as SCUBA
was too.  The challenge we face today is to take this technology forward
without losing all of the advances we've made in safety with SCUBA during
the past 50 years.  This is no small challenge, but the rewards could be
great.

The key issue appears to be training.  Where can we find people who understand
this technology well enough to shepard us through the transition?  In my mind,
we'd be fools to ignore the lessons that were bought and payed for with the
lives of US Navy divers.  Given that, I believe the choice is simple--

Buy BioMarine.

Regards,
Scott.

At 8:20 AM 10/1/96, Dennis Pierce wrote:
>Peter,
>
>thanks for your post on the forum, i couldn't wait to hear what went on..
>
>anyone else out there with comments?  rich, what do you think?  anyone
>else?


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]