Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 15:49:12 -0500 (EST)
From: samuel frushour <frushour@in*.ed*>
To: Lars Hektor <swedish_deep@gl*.se*>
cc: "'Techdiver'" <techdiver@terra.net>
Subject: Re: Dual manifold with isolator valve safe?
Never had a failure
The question of independents versus manifolded doubles seems to rise=20
repeatedly (but has importance for newcomers).
Since there are seals at either end of the crossover bar and hopefully an=
=20
isolation valve in the bar, in the event of a bar failure you close the=20
afore mentioned valve just as you would if a failure ocurred at a tank=20
valve.  This presupposes the bar fail at only one end such as with a=20
blown o-ring.  If you hit the bar hard enough to rupture both ends while=20
in the water then you are doing something that deserves to screw you like=
=20
reckless scotering.

Sam Frushour

On Tue, 27 Aug 1996, Lars Hektor wrote:

> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 21:44:56 +-200
> From: Lars Hektor <swedish_deep@gl*.se*>
> To: 'Techdiver' <techdiver@terra.net>
> Subject: Dual manifold with isolator valve safe?
>=20
> I have been giving the following question some thought....
>=20
> On a dual manifold with isolator valve. The tankpressure will always be o=
n the cross-over bar, no matter which valve is being closed. What will happ=
en in the event of a malfunction of the isolator valve that results in a le=
ak or fast gas loss. As I can=20

see it, all gas will more ore less rapidly, be lost and there is nothing th=
at can be done to prevent it.
> Personally I=B4m using independent doubles instead of the dual manifold. =
This will of course give an extra number of regulator switches and some add=
ed gas management. But on the other hand you will not have to isolate any v=
alve in the case of a freeflow,=20

certainly you will the loose the "side" that malfunctions, but it can never=
 effect the other, hopefully still working bottle. In combination with the =
thirds rule and equalization (through regulator changes), I feel this is a =
very safe system. I know that=20

a large number of very experienced divers are relying on the dual-manifol. =
So my question is, how is this problem being addressed and secondly have an=
yone had a malfunction as described above.
>=20
> Regards, Lars
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'.
> Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'.
>=20

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]