Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 17:06:09 -1000 (HST)
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
To: Dennis Pierce <dpierce@al*.ne*>
Cc: Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@po*.wo*.at*.ne*>, techdiver@terra.net
Subject: Re: Odyssey

> could this amount of "dedication it takes to consistently stay alive on a
> fully closed unit" be somewhat limited to the complexity of your cis
> lunar?

Partly because the machine I'm diving is much more complicated, yes.  But
also, I think my perspective is from the kinds of diving I'm using it for. 
There are people who think "I've done more than a 100 trimix dives past
three hundred feet, so I could really kick ass on a rebreather", and those
are the ones I want to convice that there is no free lunch.  I use the
rebreather for two things: dives deeper than 300 feet, and training dives
in shallow water.  The dive gets much more complicated down deep because
the volumetric change in the breathing loop from hunky dory to hypoxic is
much smaller than it is in shallow (200 feet or less) water.  The dive is
the dive at any depth, but the probability of discovering a malfunction
before it becomes life-threatening down deep is less than up shallow (not
to mention the consequences of a malfunction are much greater down deep).
Therefore, it requires more diligence down deep than shallow. Down deep 
is also trickier because you have to figure out more complex OC bailout 
options.

The real dividing line is when you do a dive where it's not possible or 
practical to carry enough OC supply to safely return to the surface. I 
have a hunch when you start doing those dives with the CCR500, you'll get 
a good feeling for what I'm talking about.

Aloha,
Rich

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]