Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 13:41:47 -1000 (HST)
From: Dennis Pierce <dpierce@al*.ne*>
To: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
cc: rfarb <rfarb@na*.ne*>, Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@po*.wo*.at*.ne*>,
     techdiver@terra.net
Subject: Re: your mail
sorry rich, but i was diving my fieno to almost 500', and they weren't
bounce dives either buddy... :-)

just kidding, have to admit tho, if i was hired to do a recovery at
500fsw, and i had 2 bio marine 15.5s, 2 mk4's and 2 mk5's on the boat  to
chooze from for my buddy and i.  and knowing all units were maintained and
in working condition..(you get the picture).. my choice would that exact
order.  the 15 first, the mk 4 then the mk5.   That's just the way it is.

i'd say the same thing if you stuck a 500 in place of the 15.5 but i'd
have to some shorter, larger diameter hoses...  the hoses will end up that
anyway.




dp




On Mon, 8 Jul 1996, Richard Pyle wrote:

> 

> > reliable. Better a unit from someone who has been building them for years 
> > than from a upstart. Rod
> 
> Explain to me again how you arrived at this conclusion based on your
> successful dive on the Monitor? (Congratulations, by the way - I trust 
> Kevin's dives went just as well.) I did the first rebreather dives past 400
> feet in Papua New Guinea last year.  From this I conclude, better a unit
> that incorporates modern technology than something designed to disarm mines.
> 
> Rich
> 
> P.S. ;-)
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]