Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: uunet!bishop.bishop.hawaii.org!deepreef@uu*.uu*.ne*
To: uunet!opal.com!techdiver@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Dive Rite Wings (and other things)
From: csfb1!phantom!wrolf@uu*.uu*.ne* (Wrolf Courtney)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 94 15:46:55 EDT
Rich (and others) wrote:
>> > All this talk of dissimilar tanks, doubles w/o manifolds and newbie 
>> > technical divers makes me want to remind everyone:
>> > 
>> > 	We all know of many "near-misses" and a couple of fatalities that 
>> > 	could have been avoided had a dual-outlet manifold been 
>> > 	properly used.
>> > 
>
>I have two different mixtures in my main doubles, so obviously I have a
>reason to use independant tanks.

Rich:
From the published descriptions, your rig is not fully redundant.
I am comparing with for instance a typical deep air diver, with either
fully independent doubles, or doubles with an isolating manifold.

You seem to have bought off on the theory that a Y-valve plus completely
independent first and second stages, all off a given tank, makes for
an acceptable level of redundancy.  Is this a fair statement?  Or do you
have bailout procedures with the gas mixes that you carry so that you
have redundancy?

Wrolf

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]