Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 03 Jul 96 08:58 EDT
To: ken@CO*.CI*.UF*.ED* (Ken Sallot)
From: Reef Fish (Large Nassau Grouper) <RFLNG@CL*.ED*>
Subject: Re: Cochran or Ling?
CC: techdiver@terra.net
On Wed, 3 Jul 1996 08:02:25, ken@co*.ci*.uf*.ed* (Ken Sallot) posted in
Message-ID: <ken.1214.00080A8F@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*>

> I have to say that this most recent posting by Bob Ling just does more to
> prove Mike Cochrans point then anything else. This guy is a fruitcake.

No, you don't HAVE to say, but it is your RIGHT to your opinion.
However, if you DO say, you should have taken it to EMAIL.


There would have been NO mention of Cochran by ME in Techdiver, as I
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
had made NONE THIS YEAR (and many months before that)  prior to Jim
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cobb's posting of my private email.   And no more would have been said
by me except for Cochran's follow-up.   Just check the Techdiver archives!
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I have also NEVER, EVER posted anything in Cavers list about Cochran.


None of this stuff in Techdiver NOW regarding Cochran belongs to ANY LIST.
The debate of SUBSTANCE had been over months ago.   Anyone can go back to
the archives and decide for themselve on THOSE issues.


This is not a debate.   This is CLARIFICATION of FACTS in the hopes of
alleviating further waste of bandwidth by anyone else on this matter.

-- Bob.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]