Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 11:57:15 -0700
To: Dennis Pierce <dpierce@al*.ne*>
From: cherf@ci*.co* (Scott Cherf)
Subject: Re: CCR500
Cc: Carlos Arruda Accioly <caccioly@co*.ri*.co*.br*>,
At 8:34 AM 6/27/96, Dennis Pierce wrote:

>don't remember these conversations, i would expect any piece of
>equiptment, made for the military would be built with servicability.. even
>in the field under extreme circumstances..

Sorry, I haven't dug through the archives for exact citations, but the
sentiment expressed was that the Navy could afford to pay a full time
tech for every Mk16 they deployed, and they didn't care if he spent
8 hours servicing it for every hour of use.  This seemed extreme to
me at the time, so I thought I'd ask.  I used to work for NASA and
they would only put up with this sort of excess for very short periods
of time.  Anyway, hearsay is just that.  Rod has already confirmed
that the situation is much better, but he dives the Mk15.5 by all
accounts.  I can only hope that his experience will translate to the
500.

I'm really looking forward to seeing the CCR500.  Unfortunately the only
local dealers who have a clue about CCR's are waiting for the Cochran
machine to be released, so I'll probably need to go a 'roamin to find
one.  I'll probably be in Hawaii sometime next month, I'd like to talk
with you about this.

Scott.

PS - I may be confused about the source of the bad Mk16 press.  Aside
from reading this list, I've also spoken with several SCR manufacturers,
most of whom had low opinions of their competition.  I may have picked
up this piece of 'wisdom' from one of them.

S.



Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]