Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 13:25:23 -0700
To: Dennis Pierce <dpierce@al*.ne*>
From: cherf@ci*.co* (Scott Cherf)
Subject: Re: CCR500
Cc: Carlos Arruda Accioly <caccioly@co*.ri*.co*.br*>,
At 7:23 AM 6/26/96, Dennis Pierce wrote:
>it's more like 5k and all parts except the tanks of this unit has over
>3.5 million man hours of testing on them all over the world for over
>20 years.

Dennis -

Going back a couple of years, I recall long conversations about why the
average diver shouldn't consider buying or using surplus military
re-breathers (i.e. the Mk16 or Mk15.5) because the units had been designed
for use by the military with no concern for servicability.  I know it
was said at least once that 'these units require excessive amounts of
pre-dive setup'.  Statements like 'you need to almost re-build the units
after every dive' were made.

How much of this is still true with the CCR500, and how much of it was
hogwash from the start?

Thanks,
Scott.


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]