Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@santec.boston.ma.us
Subject: Re: in-water recompression
From: gregr@jo*.cs*.su*.oz*.au* (Greg Ryan)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1993 09:17:46 +1000
Pete Keener <PSTONGE@Tr*.ca*> writes:

>        I've been following the thread about inwater decompression - I was
>particularly interested in Greg's account of the skipper's decision to
>recompress a diver on O2.

I think I should add a bit to my posting about the recent incident
in Sydney.  Like many who have posted recently, I don't think in-water
recompression is warranted unless transport to a chamber is completely
unavailable, and then only when there is adequate equipment/gas/surface
and in-water support or as the last resort.  

In the case I discussed, the in-water O2 may have helped, then again
it may have had no effect on the outcome.  I guess we'll never know.
This time things went everyone's way, but this won't always be the
case.

The benefit of discussing these incidents is more derived from
finding ways to modify gear/techniques to prevent them becoming accidents,
rather than illustrating particular accident treatments.

So I'll start the ball rolling on this one.  Remember that it was
a BC hose valve which unseated and decided to empty the tank.  I've
been told that bending up the hose and tying it off (in a knot?) would
prevent or at least slow the loss of air.  Has anyone ever tried this
or heard of it being used successfully?  It sounds plausible for
low pressure hoses, but I'm not sure about high pressure.  Sounds
like a good bathtub experiment to try.

				Greg	gregr@cs*.su*.oz*.au*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]