Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 09:13:33 -1000 (HST)
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
To: TOM MOUNT <TOM.MOUNT@po*.wo*.at*.ne*>
Cc: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes ? <mauricio@va*.EN*.de*.co*>,
     techdiver@terra.net
Subject: Re: CNS Clock
On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, TOM MOUNT wrote:

> On the CNS clock, each time you take an air break it does some degree of
> resetting the CNS clock (also the pulmonary clock) The exact amount is not
> known but it is from experience both from diives and from chamber work an
> extensive amount.



I just wanted to clarify that I DO believe in the value of short low-PO2 
breaks after long exposures to high PO2.  I don't know if it actually 
helps, but I do know that chamber operators have consistently seen the 
advantages of the breaks.  However, I don't think it's fair to directly 
compare experiences of chamber operators to the diving we do, as chambers 
generally run PO2's of close to 3 atm. As I said, the CNS% clock value 
does seem to come into play, but only at PO2's that none of us should be 
breathing.  The PO2:probability to convulsion curve is not linear. The 
most recent evidence I know of is that at PO2's on the order of 1.4, 
convulsions are random (=unpredictable; not correlated to any sort of 
"clock").

I do the low PO2 breaks, but not because I belive in the CNS% clock at 
PO2 values of 1.4 atm or less.

Aloha,
Rich

Richard Pyle
deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*
*******************************************************************
"WHATEVER happens to you when you willingly go underwater is
COMPLETELY and ENTIRELY your own responsibility! If you cannot
accept this responsibility, stay out of the water!"
*******************************************************************

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]