On Sat, 15 Jun 1996, Carlos Arruda Accioly wrote: > Rich, > > Why don't you? I'd guess you keep your ppO2 so low that it ceases to be > a problem. Is that so? No. I keep my PO2 at 1.4 for the whole dive, which is a greater O2 exposure than most OC divers get. I don't have time to cover the entire rationale for why I don't bother calculating CNS% clocks, but suffice it to say that, if you understand how far-off deco schedules are from physiological reality, I am convinced that the CNS% concept is about 100-fold further off. I don't disagree with the practice for training agencies - it only adds another level of conservatism. But in a system where chaos is the rule, I prefer to keep my oversimplifications to a minimum. Rich > > Cheers, > > Carlos 8^) > > > > >> On Mon, 2 Oct 1995, Ronnie Bell wrote: > >> > >> > In light of your post remarking on how people should not just foist a > >> > "standard" on us but rather explain the whys and wherefores I like to ask > >> > you and the list at large the following question: > >> > "Exactly how do you use CNS clock values in your dive planning?" > > > >I do not use it at all in my dive planning. > > > >Aloha, > >Rich > >-- > >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > >Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. > > > > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. > Richard Pyle deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or* ******************************************************************* "WHATEVER happens to you when you willingly go underwater is COMPLETELY and ENTIRELY your own responsibility! If you cannot accept this responsibility, stay out of the water!" *******************************************************************
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]