In a previous message, Peter N.R. Heseltine wrote: > Why would someone of Mr. Gilliam's undoubted experience fail to mention > that CNS seizures have occurred with brief exposures to pPO2's as low as > 1.3 ATA (US Navy Divers Handbook - 9/95 edition) and advise sport divers > (the majority of Undercurrent readers) that they may expose themselves to > cumulative O2 toxicity that the US Navy/NOAA consider extreme? As the CEO Come on now, just exactly how many of these tox hits have there been? I would bet good money that 99.99% of all individuals could do a non-working dive at 1.58 PP02 for 20 minutes without any problems. I would not extend that claim to repetetive dives or to working dives. If someone belives that this is still too much of a risk, then that person should stay out of the water. If anyone has numbers that can dispute my claim, then please let me know. -- Regards, Andy W. Barclay. andy@le*.ca* UNIX Instructor Team Leader / Queensview Branch Manager (pgp publickey avail at ftp.learnix.ca:/pub/pgp.publickeys.pgp) Just because everything is different doesn't mean anything has changed. --SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ORACLE
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]