Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 96 21:38 BST-1
From: sgreenham@ci*.co*.co*.uk* (Steve Greenham)
Subject: Re: DCS incident - PFO diagnosed, opinions needed.
To: Olly.Kierse@an*.co*, scuba-uk@un*.uk*.vb*.ne*, techdiver@terra.net,
     rec.scuba@an*.co*
Cc: sgreenham@ci*.co*.co*.uk*
In-Reply-To: <9604291437.AA18562@nw*.an*.co*>
> I'm posting this for a buddy who got hit, and does not have net access.

Sorry to hear about your buddy. Something similar happened in our branch 
several years ago; an advanced diver with many dives under his belt 
suddenly got CNS effects after a not particularly provocative dive. He 
made a full recovery, but took the medical advice to hang up his 
regulator. Very sad for him, and a great loss to our club.
 
> Who rejects confirmed PFOs?

I suppose this depends who your certifying agency is. With the BSAC you 
must have a current medical to dive, and a known PFO would almost 
certainly disqualify you as the doctor is likely to take the view that it 
is only a passtime and err on the side of caution. You could cover it up 
and probably get away with it, particularly on holiday dives, but is it 
worth it? 

> Why?
> Reconcile this with medical proof of 30% PFO incidence in normal 
> population? With 30% of the pop affected, why aren't divers tested 
> and 30% rejected?

Cost. Also, the figures are 10%-30% of the population depending on who 
measured it. A couple of quotes from Bennett & Elliott may help:-

"The question of qualification of the diver with a right to left shunt in 
the circulatory system has become important following a study by Moon, 
Camporesi and Kisslo in 1989. Thirty divers with decompression suckness 
were studied by echocardiography and in the 18 divers with serious DCI 
61% had evidence of shunting through a PFO during Valsava manouvre. This 
incidence of PFO is far in excess of a normal population and suggests the 
possibility of assymptomaticbubbles entering the arterial circulation by 
right to left shunting. At the present time [1993] there are no 
conclusive findings. The individual with a known PFO should be made aware 
of the possible increased risk in diving. The diver who has had serious 
decompression illness and is found to have a PFO requires individual 
counselling concerning future diving, particularly if examination of teh 
dive profile shows that decompression illness was unmerited. There is no 
recommendation for screening all divers for PFO, although some 
authorities  recommend offering such screening to every candidate for 
diver training. Certainly there are currently divers with an undiagnosed 
PFO diving with no difficulty at all." p64

"The prevalence of PFO in the healthy, adult population is estimated to 
be between 10% and 30% depending on the detection method used. A number 
of recent cross-sectional studies have shown a higher incidence of PFO in 
divers who have suffered decompression illness compared with control 
populations. On the other hand there are examples of highly experienced 
professional divers who have not had clinically overt DCI and yet have 
been found to have a PFO. The proposal of inter-arterial defects as 
conduits for the right to left shunting of blood and bubbles is 
particularly plausible in divers, since the effects of cold, immersion 
and pulmonary artery gas embolism will increase right heart pressures. 
However further studies will be necessary before the association between 
arterial septal defects and DCI can be considered causal." [references 
omitted] p457 
 
> The heart pumps both sides simultaneously and as the freshly oxygenated 
> supply
> is to the whole body, the pressure will be higher on that side than the 
> other,
> hence the cross-flow will be just to recirculate. The 'victim' saw this
> clearly on the enhanced U/S Doppler image. PFO under normal situations
> cross-flows from the newly oxygenated lungs back into the CO2 and N2 
> rich feed
> to the lungs so no increased risk there.

See above. There is a difference between a hospital setting and diving 
setting. 
 
> This
> is only going to present a potential risk when outgassing, ie
> ascending+decompressing and again is transitory. 

So you are only at risk of DCI when outgassing. Presumably if you can 
dive without decompressing you are safe. :-)
 
> So thats it - he's in a sitaution where info is hard to find

Its not that hard to find, but it may be hard to accept if you love 
diving. If your friend can get to Huddersfield it would be worth seeing 
if  he can make an appointment with Peter Wilmshurst who is a world 
expert in PFO and diving. Contact details are:-

        Dr Peter Wilmshurst
        Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
        Huddersfield
        HD3 3EA
        UK
        
        Tel: +44 1484 422191 

Good luck!
Steve

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]