I think it is well known among people who have a clue that the filling is always done the same. But for some funny reason, I personnally get a warm fuzzy feeling from a lot number than can be traced. Now I know that is no guarentee either, but for the buck extra, I 'll splurge. I know my supplier treats all bottles identically when they come in (they are drained and purged) but i am not sure if all suplliers do this for industrial. I think this is required for medical. Anyway, I still prefer gas in a botlle marked medical, be it o2 or he2. At 10:22 AM 4/17/96 -0400, Mario Nicola wrote: >> I heard they were using industrial oxygen for nitrox and telling people >> aviators was harmful. Any truth to this that you know of? > > This is another fine example of BS and strokery. > > Aviators oxygen, I believe is checked to make sure it >has a low moister content for obvious reasons, but I'm not >an aviator so don' t take my word for this. > > As far as industrial and medical oxygen is concerned >there is absolutely no deference between the two. > The cylinders are filled from the same liquid oxygen bank, >the difference is in the maintenance and handling of the tanks, >and believe me, I have seen industrial tanks in a lot >better shape than medical cylinders. This does not mean this is >always the case. > Oxygen is oxygen is oxygen. No deference other than what you >are breathing it out of, and impurities that can enter the tank during >transfer. This is why o2 should always be analyzed before using or >mixing. >Mario >
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]