Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
You wrote: > >Tom, > >Screw the comedy, it is lost on you. I don't know why you insist on making me >out to be the bad guy. All I want is clarification on a post that stated that >you can deco on your helium based backgas by strictly looking at the O2 content. >I DID NOT MAKE THAT STATEMENT. My understanding of the subject does not allow me >to agree with that statement, but I don't know everything and am not on the >cutting edge. Apparently you do not agree with it either. ONE NOBODY JUMPED ON YOUR CASE YOU POSTED A POST THAT HAD THE da SCRIPT WITH IT AND SAID THAT WAS A COMOICA;L SCRIPT, i JUST REPLIED I DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE COMEDEY AND THEN WROTE THE DECO SCHEDULES FOR WHOMEVER MIGHT BE INTERESTED. I WROTE TWO RESPONSES TO THE FULL OF SHIT COMMENT, THE FIRST FOR SOME REASON DID NOT GO THROUGH, OR LEAST I HAVE NOT SEEN IT POSTED. BUT THE ANSWERS ON THE SCHEDULES ARE ON PURE ZERO SAFETY FACTOR DIRECT BULHMAN MODELS. IF GEORGE OR ANYONE DECOS ON BULHMAN TABLES THAT IS HOW THEY WILL BE PRESENTED. IF YOU DECO ON BOTTOM MIX WITH HELIUM BY ALL DECPO MODELS AND ALL PHYSIOLOGIST IT REQUIRES MORE DECO. PREHAPS GEORGES PHYSIOLOGY DIFFERS FROM THE REST OF US. HOWEVER WHEN DIVING HERE AT THE SAME TIME I'M IN THE WATER HE SPENDS ALMOST AS MUCH TIME AT DECO AS I DO. YES HE DOES LONG INDIVIDUAL DECOMPRESSIONS. BUT I DOUBT THAT HIS TOTAL DECO ANNUALLY IS AS GREAT AS EITHER MINE , BILLYS ARE A NUMBER OF OTHERS OUT THERE. AND I'M NOT WILLIONG TO TAKE THE INDIVIDUAL DECO RISK HE IS, I DO RESPECT DECO I DO NOT FEAR IT OR I WOULD NOT DO THE DIVES I DO. THIS PARA IS NOT DIRECTED AT YOU PERSE IT IS THE INFO IN THE ONE REPLY I POSTED THAT DID NOT MAKE IT TO TECHDIVER FOR SOME REASON. > >Now George has asked that these questions not be directed at him, that's a >shame. I believe he and his team will take diving to the next level. I think you >also believe this, but when George posted that we would not understand his >methods and that you were full of shit on this, you just put on the pads and >replied "we perhaps agree". Someone states you are full of shit and you agree, >but I ask for MORE INFORMATION and you jump on my case! Gimme a f_ckin' break! > WE DO NOT AGREE ON ALL THINGS WE DO AGREE THAT SOME USE SAFETY FACTORS AND OTHERS DO NOT. >Get this straight, I DO NOT FAKE POSTS. I DO NOT DISPENSE DECO PROCEDURES. I >LIKE THE JERKY BOYS. I AM A DECO WEENIE. I WOULD LIKE TO STOP BEING A DECO >WEENIE. If you do not have a sense of humor or cannot read between the lines, >well that's not my problem. Don't take this the wrong way. I'm neither angry nor >offended, but I believe you're directing your energy in the wrong way. > >Tony >TONY I JUST ANSWERED A QUESTION ON DECO ON DIFFERENT MIXES AND SHOWED YOU WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU HAD TO DECO PER THE BULHMAN MODEL ON THE BOTTOM MIX. UNLIKE GEORGE I HAVE TREATED DIVERS INCLUDING THOSE BENT ON HELIUM AND ALL DECO PROBLEMS WITH ANY GAS CAN BECOME SERIOUS. I RESPECT DECO SO GUESS THAT MAKES ME A WEENIE BUT I HAVE A HELL OF A LOT OF BOTH THEORY, PRACTICAL AND PRACTICE BACKGROUND IN DECOMPRESSION, AND TREATMENT OF DIVERS. PLUS A GOOD EDUCATION ALONG THAT LINE. I HAVE COMPLETED FIVE HYPERBARIC MEDICINE COURSES HAVE TAUGHT CHAMBER OPS AND BEEN ACTIVE IN THAT FIELD BEFORE MOST PEOPLE ON THIS NET WERE EVEN DIVING. BETWEEN 1968 AND 1976 I SUPERVISED THE CHAMBER AT RSMAS THAT TREATED ALMOST EVERY DIVER WITH DCI IN SOUTH FL AND THE BAHAMAS, I HAVE SEEN A LOT OF BENDS. I HAVE ALSO SEEN THE GUYS THAT THEORY DID NOT APPLY TO ONCE IT DID CATCH UP, AND IT ONLY TAKES ONE CATCH UP TIME, I WILL GIVE YOU SOME NAMES TO CONTACT IF YOU WISH TO CHECK THAT OUT. THEY TOO FOR A LONG TIME REQUIRED LESS DECO THAN OTHERS AND GOT BY WITH MORE PERSONAL APPROACHES TO DECO. THEY WILL BE GLAD TO RELATE THE MONTHS IT TOOK TO LEARN TO WALK AGAIN. THAT IS WHY I GET UPSET WHEN SOMEONE STARTS IMPLYING THAT DECO MODELS ARE BS. ONCE YOU SEE YOUNG PEOPLE WHOSE WHOLE BODY IS LIMP LIKE PUTTY BECAUSE OF A DECO ACCIDENT THAT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED, YOU GET UPSET WHEN SONEONE IMPLIES THAT PROVEN MODELS ARE BS. AND THAT PEOPLE WHO ADVOCATE THEM ARE FULL OF SHIT AS GEORGE STATES I'AM WHICH MEANS NOT ME BUT THE PEOPLE WHO DEVELOPED THE MODELS. AS GEORGE SAID CONTACT BILL HAMILTON HE ADVOCATED SAFE MODELS SO I DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW GEORGE CAN REFER TO HIM AND STILL STATE THE MODELS OR PERSONS USING THEM PER SE ARE FULL OF SHIT. WITH NEW THEORUES EVOLVING WE MAY BE MAKING EVEN MORE CHANGES AS THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT TWO SEPERATE APPROACHES MAY BE NEEDED FOR PAIN ONLY DCI AND CNS DCI. TO THAT END THE STOP MIDWAY BETWEEN THE BOTTOM AND FIRST STOP WILL MOST LIKELY BECOME A PART OF THE EMERGING MODELS. MANY ODF US ALREADY PRACTICE THAT AND HAVE FOR SOMETIME. HAVE A HAPPY DAY AND ENJOY SOME SAFE DIVING TOM MOUNT P.S. I DO NOT KNOW IF YOU WROTE THE DA(SUCKERS) MESSAGE OR JUST COPIED IT OR WHAT. I WOULD HAVE IGNORED IT REGARDLESS EXCEPT THE CONTENT COULD CAUSE AN UNINFORMED DIVER TO GET HURT. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE ANGRY OR UPSET ABOUT AS MY ONLY INTENT WAS/IS TO CLARIFY THE ISSUE POSTED. > >I DID NOT ADRESS THIS ISSUE TO GET INTO A LOT OF ARGUEMENTS OR TO CAUSE YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE TO FEEL OFFENDED. PREHAPS GETTING OFF THE SCENE(FORUMS) WOULD BE A MORE PEACEFUL EXISTANCE.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]