PCP should not be used while diving. Only before or after. So I don't really think that techdiver should even consider using PCP. Angeldust, maybe. I mean you don't really feel like talking much on PCP but it by no means should be considered censorship. If everybody on the list was taking PCP then who would even notice fake email. So, maybe that's what everybody should do. Like, this is just an opinion, OK. So, you know, like, don't torch me, man. On Wed, 13 Mar 1996, Steve Galperin wrote: > > > It _does_ limit conversation, since 99.9% of the people aren't willing to > > put up with the hassle of decrypting each message, and either won't read > > or will simply unsubscribe. > > > > > Again, PGP causes no censorship, it simply would put an end to > > > (99.9% of) the fakes. > > > > Directly, no, but indirectly, by causing the unsubscription of everyone, > > it does. > > > > I'd be curious to know how many people actually decrytped and read JR's > > PGP notes. I didn't, and I'm probably more computer technically inclined > > than half the list base. PGP is a pain. > > > > I agree! I can add a block that looks like PGP signature, but only > a handful of people will catch it because most of us never > check the signature. If it makes you happy, put it on. But I for > one don't know how to decryt it, and don't have a great burning > desire to aquire the software to do it. I've never seen any of > these fake posts. It could be because I kill off most of the silly > name calling that comes along. > > Stephen Galperin > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. >
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]