Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: stuart.cannon@br*.ac*.uk* (stuart cannon)
Subject: Re: Introduction + question
From: Carl G Heinzl <heinzl@wi*.en*.de*.co*>
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Cc: heinzl@wi*.en*.de*.co*
Date: Mon, 16 May 94 14:52:08 EDT
>When teaching on a BSAC Oxygen Administration course we tell our students
>to expect a transient worsening of symptons to a casualty shortly after
>starting to administer 100% O2. This is due to two reasons. Firslty, if
>there is a lodged bubble some of the oxygen in solution will diffuse into
>the nitrogen bubble. Secondly, the body reacts to the higher partial pressure
>of O2 and reduces the blood flow due to vasoconstriction. This can be read
>in the BSAC Safety and Rescue manual.

This may be a stupid question but I was brought up to believe that the
only stupid question is one that goes unasked...

Given that the patient will be breathing *some* gas at 1 ata, why would
O2 diffuse into the nitrogen bubble any more than additional nitrogen
(if they were only breathing air)???

The way that I see it, if you're breathing pure O2 then the PP N2 in the
lungs and bloodstream should go down (faster than by breathing air, which
would have a PP N2 of .79) causing an increased rate of N2
offgassing.  Eventually, the N2 bubble will diffuse back into solution
because of a low PP N2 in the surrounding tissues.  The issue will be
whether this happens soon enough to prevent tissue damage.

If my logic is flawed I'm sure I will be corrected...

-Carl-

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]