Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 20:28:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Maiken <ebmaiken@ea*.oa*.uc*.ed*>
To: Dan Volker <dlv@ga*.ne*>
cc: techdiver@terra.net
Subject: blow-n-go

Hey Dan

> 
> So the concept of "Blow and go" 

> could be seen as  be begging for bigger bubbles, which could be more 
>problematic than the decreased nitrogen  absorbtion "Blow and Go"  was 
used to  eliminate... 

Yes. By Causing a large gradient(~5ata) to exist between tissue nearly 
saturated at 260fsw (as all *fast* compartments will be after 25 min) and 
gas cavities pressurized at the ambient 100 ft stop, you could cause a 
population of bubble nuclei to start growing. 

> Typically Blow and go was followed by pure O2 at 20 foot and 10 foot stops, 
> with some air breaks, and this seemed (at the time) to be effective in 
> removing or shrinking bubbles...what are your current thoughts on this. It 
> would seem to me that at the very least, this was probably a great way to 
> "Farm" bubbles, 

It was the opinion of some bubble modelers that the importance of long, 
shallow stops in traditional deco schedules arose from the need to treat 
bubbles formed early on in the ascent (by neglecting deep stops). 

In addition to radicals like Rich and George who do DEEP stops, the rest of 
the deco-diving world often employ practices that look good from a 
bubble-reducing standpoint:

> "pull" your 10ft stop at 20ft on O2. 
Supersaturation models (Buhlmann, etc)don't provide rational for the 
efficiency of this practice (the out-gasing should be th same because 
inspired FN2 is zero). Bubble models argue for pulling because the 
increased pressure will help drive gas out of bubbles.

> Use nitrox 80/20 starting at 30fsw rather than O2 starting at 20fsw. 
Opening the O2 window as early as possible will eliminate bubbles. 

>IWR relies on bubble squashing ideas.
Arguments against IWR based on the supposed inefficiency of Boyle's law 
in reducing bubble volume are idiotic. There may be good medical reasons 
to avoid IWR though....

>pause for a minute or two every 30ft from bottom up to your first 
Buhlmann stop.


Regards, EM



_____________________________________________________________
Eric Maiken                    email: ebmaiken@ea*.oa*.uc*.ed*              
Dept. of Physics                   o: 714 824-6621   
U. of California                 fax: 714 824-2174
Irvine, CA 92715-4575

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]