Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 11:32:16 -0500
To: Robert Wolov <wolov@hi*.co*>
From: dlv@ga*.ne* (Dan Volker)
Subject: gas exchange rates as they effect nitrogen saturation
Cc: "George M. Irvine III" <gmiiii@in*.co*>, techdiver@terra.net
Hi Rob, George
This is an idea I have posted previously, but still have found few 
authorities to react and do any thing about it.

The concept is, since gas exchange rates vary enormously between ultra fit 
endurance athlete types, normals, and sedentary persons, ingassing and out 
gassing CAN NOT BE PREDICTED ACCURATELY FOR ALL TYPES. 

Of specific concern, on a extreme exposure dive, the ultra fit diver with 
measurably high VO2 Max (which I think should be placed in a formulae and 
correlated with nitrogen in-gassing and out gassing rates, as it is and 
individual specific measure of gas exchange potential), should have absorbed 
MORE nitrogen after, say, 25 minutes at 150 feet, than the normal or 
sedentary diver. 

Now, offgassing rates are less tied to straight blood flow and gradient than 
is the ingassing rate, so this higher nitrogen saturation in the ultra-fit 
diver, is not necessarily offgassed at the same volume per minute ratio as  
would be predicted by the tables or even by the accelerated exchange rates 
seen on ingassing....While still more vascular, the fit diver has nitrogen 
saturation in tissues which will only release at a given rate, not tied as 
directly to fitness level.
so in the first 50 foot and 40 foot stops, it would be sensible to conclude 
the fit diver should take longer stops than the unfit, maybe even adding a 
60 foot stop not needed by the unfit diver----better gas exchange in the fit 
diver should allow better offgassing (relative to the unfit diver) so that 
somewhere in the shallower stops (30, 20 , 10) , the fit diver will catch up 
and then become less nitrogen saturated than the unfit divers. 

This same reasoning would predict that in a recreational profile, say 60ft  
for 55min, the unfit diver with poor gas exchange would be less at risk in a 
no -stop ascent to the surface, than would the more heavily saturated fit 
diver....But if both performed 10 minute safety stops, there is no doubt 
that the fit diver would surface with far less nitrogen loading than the 
unfit diver, and we all know EVERYONE should always do a safety stop, anyway.

What are your thoughts on this Rob, and do you have any recommendations in 
how to implement this as a modification to the tables using VO2 max. I am 
copying this to George as well, and hopefully he will print it out and show 
it to Bill Hamilton, for his views and expertise in the physiological and  
statistical decompression model arena.
Regards
Dan
Dan Volker
SOUTH FLORIDA DIVE JOURNAL
"The Internet magazine for Underwater Photography and mpeg Video"
http://www.florida.net/scuba/dive
407-683-3592

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]