And if you keep posting these private messages you will not get invited to the annual "Rear Buccaneer Banquet". At 10:49 AM 3/1/96 -0500, you wrote: > >Harris, Your threats mean absolutely nothing to me. If you want to talk >about libel let's take a look at the things you have sent out about the >WKPP, George Irvine and me over the past few months. I will continue to >forward everything you send me or my attorney to every list I can think >of, you are welcome to call your dime store lawyer and tell him that. >You may want to check and see if your attorney gives good head because >that's all your going to need him for. > >Rick > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 01:25:02 -0500 >From: Caveslime@ao*.co* >To: ricksankey <rsankey@fr*.tl*.fl*.us*> >Cc: harrismartin <caveslime@ao*.co*> >Subject: integrity > >Rick, > >This is a private message. You do not have my consent to show or forward it >to anyone or post it to any email list. If you choose to contravene this >lack of consent, you may want to consider the legal consequences. > >At 12:16 AM on 2-29-96, you stated: > >>I had nothing to do with any fake Harris Martin posts, his real posts >provide adequate amusement on their own. I guess what they say about drug >induced paranoia is true. > >You sir, are rude and obnoxious. You demonstrate a complete lack of >integrity with such libelous public statements and by your public posting to >the cavers' list, of my 2-28-96 private message to you. It does not look >like you would qualify for any professional organization's code of ethics. > >At 12:02 PM on 2-29-96, you stated: > >>I HAVE NEVER GENERATED A SINGLE FAKE POST !!!! > >Then why do you make a habit of responding to posts that are obvious >forgeries? Because your statements lack integrity, they also lack >credibility. I don't trust you. The odds are good that you are not being >honest in this and that if you are being honest in this, you know who wrote >the fake posts in question. Like they say in Missouri, show me. Show me why >I should believe you. > >>GO F___ YOURSELF. > >That statement is not very mature Rick. This proves my point. Again, you >shoot yourself in the foot. Your attorney would likely advise you not to put >this sort of statement in print and send it to someone. > >On 2-26-96, you said: > >>I would be interested to know what diving related problems you think our >>attitudes have caused. > >It doesn't have to be diving related. Your attitudes have resulted in hate, >libel, and sadism directed at other people. This is a problem. This >behaviour demonstrates that you lack honor or integrity. > >>I'm not interested in hearing anything about > >A very hostile and rude manner of speech. > >>people who condone or advocate the use of "recreational drugs", > >This looks like libel to me. Who is your attorney? My attorney may want to >talk to him. I would not want to embarass you by having papers served on you >personally (I would be happy to serve your attorney). > >>or anyone >>else who can't take the heat of our approach and has hurt feelings. >>Rick Sankey > >This "take the heat" stuff is little more than macho posturing. Yes, I am >offended by your behavior but I'm not some sort of injured victim. I don't >let obnoxious people ruin my day. I enjoy a happy and productive life in >spite of nasty, hatefull people I sometimes need to deal with. You can not >take from me my honor, integrity, or sense of humor. > >Harris Martin > >P.S. I am reminding you that this is a private message and I do not give my >consent for you to disclose it to anyone else other than your attorney or a >court of law. HM. > > > > > PJD [\]
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]