Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: 1 Mar 1996 11:48:11 -0600
From: "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@da*.ne*>
Subject: Apology to Barry Miller
To: "TechDiver" <techdiver@terra.net>
On 3/1/96 at 10:36:12 AM Barry Miller wrote:

> Richard,   I am not George's lacky, I argue with him all the time. The only 
> difference is I learn from those arguements to try to be a better diver.

> I chose not to respond to your lighting question because unlike George, I
will not waste my time with you.

Thank you for your response. I regret that you feel that responding to a
serious question is a waste of time.

> You seem to already have insulted me before I could even answer your
question, you never gave me a chance, and yet you attack me.

I am sorry if I offended you by even suggesting that you might be George's
lackey. It is obvious from the tone of your response that you, unlike some of
the others in WKPP, have been unjustly demeaned. I have committed "guilt by
association". For this, I apologize.

I hope that you will reconsider.

As I have previously stated, I feel that your "product" is superior to mine
and I am seeking opportunities to improve. In honesty, I cannot say that I
would unconditionally adopt any of your practices. However I would promise to
give them serious consideration. I am quite willing to change my practices if
I feel that it will improve my results. 


Richard Wackerbarth
rkw@da*.ne*

Sent with a test-drive version of CTM PowerMail 1.0.6 <http://www.ctm.ch>

------------------ Enclosed/Nested Letter Follows ------------------

The following message could not be sent because the address
'teckdiver@te*.ne*' was rejected by host 'terra.net'.
550 <teckdiver@te*.ne*>... User unknown

    ----Unsent message follows----



******************* NOTE *******************
There may be important message content
contained in the following MIME Information.
********************************************


------------------ MIME Information follows ------------------

--d8c87e01be6d97440a01f627
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

<<<<<< See above "Message Body" >>>>>>

--d8c87e01be6d97440a01f627
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from 199.183.109.242 by DATAPLEX.NET
 with SMTP (MailShare 1.0fc5); Fri, 1 Mar 1996 10:47:08 -0600
Message-ID: <n1386445300.96351@Ri* Wackerbarth>
Date: 1 Mar 1996 10:24:29 -0600
From: "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@da*.ne*>
Subject: Re(2) Re(2) What Lightiing for Video
To: "Barry Miller" <millerb@fr*.sc*.fs*.ed*>,    "cavers@ge*.co*"
<cavers@ge*.co*>,    "teckdiver@te*.ne*" <teckdiver@te*.ne*>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link PT/Internet 1.6.0

On 3/1/96 at 10:36:12 AM Barry Miller wrote:

> Richard,   I am not George's lacky, I argue with him all the time. The only 
> difference is I learn from those arguements to try to be a better diver.

> I chose not to respond to your lighting question because unlike George, I
will not waste my time with you.

Thank you for your response. I regret that you feel that responding to a
serious question is a waste of time.

> You seem to already have insulted me before I could even answer your
question, you never gave me a chance, and yet you attack me.

I am sorry if I offended you by even suggesting that you might be George's
lackey. It is obvious from the tone of your response that you, unlike some of
the others in WKPP, have been unjustly demeaned. I have committed "guilt by
association". For this, I apologize.

I hope that you will reconsider.

As I have previously stated, I feel that your "product" is superior to mine
and I am seeking opportunities to improve. In honesty, I cannot say that I
would unconditionally adopt any of your practices. However I would promise to
give them serious consideration. I am quite willing to change my practices if
I feel that it will improve my results. 

Richard Wackerbarth
rkw@da*.ne*

Sent with a test-drive version of CTM PowerMail 1.0.6 <http://www.ctm.ch>


--d8c87e01be6d97440a01f627--

------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
 From: Postmaster@DA*.NE*
 To: rkw@da*.ne*
 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 10:47:16 -0600
 Message-ID: <-1386445260167900710@DA*.NE*>
 Subject: Undeliverable Mail
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="d8c87e01be6d97440a01f627"
 

------------------ End of Enclosed/Nested Letter ------------------

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]