Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Andy Barclay <andy@le*.ca*>
Subject: Re: Fake posts and using PGP
To: gmiiii@in*.co*, techdiver@terra.net
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 18:19:03 -0500 (EST)
In a previous message, gmiiii@in*.co* wrote:

> two, all of you who don't like what goes on here need to start your own list.
> You can keep me off of it, and you will be safe. We have two priveate lists
> where we, in turn, do not have to listen to crap about transpacs and spare 
> airs, and can discuss real operational dive planning and equipment, as well
as 
George;
Fuck^H^H^H^H Thank you very much for your kind reply..... ;)

Don't worry, I'm not easily offended.....
Anyway, I wasn't aware that you were the person who was forging the mail.
And it doesn't fucking matter anyway. All that matters was that the 
person you forged was pissed. You should have signed the post
aknowleging it as a forgery. It would have been just as funny...
In this case you didn't "Do it right", you did it fucking wrong.

> how to deal with situations without morons interjecting. You guys should do
> the same. You could have PGP and without the pros, you  could have great 
<snip>

hmmm, ok George.
have your tantrum. "take your ball and go home" for all I care.

Don't get me wrong. I appreciate your posts. I think your suggestions are
excellent,  but don't threaten to leave just cause you wouldn't be able
to forge mail anymore.

> dicussions about how to lift dumpsters with five-gallon buckets and how to
> dive deco gas on your back, and the advantages of indpendent doubles 
> using helmets and cobra guards while buttmounting square lights. What fun!
>  Give it a try.

Actually, this reminds me of the time a couple of us tried to lift a big
friggin anchor with a couple of tractor inner tubes.... Not a pretty
sight.

P.S. Don't worry george, I haven't heard from the list owner yet about
implementing the PGP thing, so I think you are safe.

-- 
Regards,
Andy W. Barclay.        andy@le*.ca*
Team Leader

The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its
credibility. And Vice-Versa.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]