The Bridge II is a good computer and the problems of the first model were corrected. It can be set for PO2 of up to 50% but does not allow for different mixes on same dive. It is compact and can be either wrist or hose mounted. The only negative thing I can think of right now is the current bottom time display is smaller than I would like but OK. On the doubles and Transpac, If you are not going to use single tanks why would you want a BC that is marginal for doubles (the arrangement can be improved) when backplate, harness and wings support doubles with much more stability? just my opinions Sam Frushour On Tue, 19 Dec 1995, Robert Maluso wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 19:27:21 -0500 > From: Robert Maluso <rmaluso@ra*.co*> > To: techdiver@terra.net > Subject: New to the list > > Hello everyone...I am new to the techdiver list. What I've > seen looks like just what I'm looking for. I am a > north-east wreck diver. I do most of my diving off NJ, DE > and Maryland. Most of my dives are between 90' to 150'. I > am diving with independent double 100's. I am planning to > do most of my dives next season with Nitrox. I would like > the groups advice on the best Nitrox computer out there. I > think I will be staying away from the air integrated models > due to the fact that my tanks are not manifolded. I read > the recient artical in Aqua Corps and they seem to think > that the Bridge II is the best bet. I know there were > problems with the first Bridge and I'm wondering if Dive > Rite worked out all the bugs. Any advice would be > appreciated. I am also thinking of getting a Dive Rite > Trans Pac. Does anyone have any experience with them? > Thanks, > Robert M > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. >
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]