Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
At 6:14 PM 12/10/95, GeorgeIrvine@in*.co* wrote: > William, enogh of the semantics - you and I both know what is > going on here. Mount is not exactly William Faulkner, and these > guys are hammering him for it, just like you are. > > Let me tell all of you something. I am the one out there doing > these dives, along with my team. We all use the antioxidants. We do > not know for sure if they are keeping us alive, but like I said the > first time, we believe it helps, and we have been told it does not hurt. > > I have always taken them, but I like to work out hard, and I > get a much better recovery and nonexistant colds than if I do not > use them. > > Just like you , I go intravenous when necessary . > > Look at my most recent video and keep in mind that I am 44 -argue > with that. - G there is a difference between scientific proof and anecdotal proof or belief if you are saying that Tom just MEANT that he BELIEVES they help but there is no PROOF, that is another story...THAT would be semantic somehow i give Tom Mount the credit to take what he says at his word i wasn't (and still am not) "attacking"...as i said..i'd bet i take more in the way of vitamins (including anti-oxidants) than most what i WAS doing was clarifying and ASKING Tom to cite some references John Crea dn John Comly did similarly...and then YOU jumped on them for a host of unrelated reasons i still don't see how asking for studies to back up a claim of "proven to help" is inappropriate. YOU said (above): "We do not know for sure if they are keeping us alive, but like I said the first time, we believe it helps, and we have been told it does not hurt." if that was all Tom had said to begin with there would have been no argument cheers,
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]