rfarb <rfarb@na*.ne*> wrote (Subject: Re: Spelling of a word):- > ... the recently completed International Military Rebreather Swimoff > Competition held in the Panama Canal. The U.S. team [defeated] the Brits by > nearly five hours in the single coast-to-coast swim competition. ... It likely depends on details of the set. There are many shapes of rebreather. Likely 30 frogmen could be equipped each with a different set. There are many variants of the UK naval rebreather: UBA (underwater breathing apparatus), SCBA (swimmer-canoeists breathing apparatus), SCMBA (ditto + `mixture'), CDBA (clearance divers' breathing apparatus), etc, all with the usual UK shape with a breathing bag on the chest and a round canister in it and one wide breathing tube. They often have the oxygen cylinder across the belly, making drag, worse if there are 2 or 3 cylinders so placed, as in a photograph in a BSAC diving manual. But in the SCBA the oxygen cylinders are lengthwise along the back out of the way for clinbing in and out of boats wearing the set, and thus likely making less drag. And consider the shape of the backpack weight-pocket that those sets often have. And all trailing tubes and odds and ends. If the diver wears a sport-diver-type weightbelt, that rear edges of the weights can act as drag also. A loose drysuit that lies in wrinkles can have some effect. To get ultimate speed, all sorts of petty drag causers can add up amd need to be eliminated. In such speed tests, how would fare modern backpack-box automatic mixture rebreathers? The production Cis-Lunar and Phibian look well streamlined. But for ultimate agility for a short dive (<= 30 or 40 minutes), give me the good old diving-and-industrial Siebe Gorman Salvus! (as below) > And, in the men, singles, wounded-in-combat, continuous round-trip swim, the > U.S. outpaced the Brits by seventeen hours. ... How did they simulate woundedness? A restraint or orthopedic device (what sort?), or was it a towing test? or how? > In the team overall category, the U.S. finished first ... To rfarb@na*.ne*: Any chance of you please mailing (on paper, not email) me a photocopy of whatever article this news came from? It sounds interesting. // // // _____ ___ _______________________ / / / \ / \/ __||__ \____________________________/ / /___ | | \ x=(______) \___________|__ / /O | | | \ |=| | =|=====> | \/ | |__/| | \/==| | _________________||_____|__ \ \__/ | |\ \ /|_____|______/ \ \ \\=============\ \/ \ \ \___/===\ \ A.Appleyard, E28d, UMIST, Manchester Univ\ \ \ \ UK. a.appleyard@fs*.mt*.um*.ac*.uk* \\ ______________\ \ \\ ===--| | \\ ===--|____________________/
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]