Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:56:50 -0400
Subject: Re: MHK's Virus
From: Joel Markwell <joeldm@mi*.co*>
To: Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>, Jammer Six <jammer@oz*.ne*>
CC: Cavers List <cavers@cavers.com>
on 5/15/00 8:29 PM, Kevin Connell at kevin@nw*.co* wrote:

> I don't see how "useless in a TCO aware environment" is a good term for DIR.

Huh? TCO: Total Cost of Ownership?? MACs have a lower TCO than any computer!
It's also about as DIR as you can get. In fact, I think you have your wires
crossed. DIR is more MAC-like in that it's got a small and devoted
following, it's more sensibly and intelligently laid out. It's designed from
the ground up to be fully integrated and user-friendly.

On the other hand, Windoze is more like "personal preference" divers. The
"rest" of the world dives non-DIR. Not designed at all, something that just
happened over time as more and more crap got added onto the OS and the
systemboards until crashing and Windows have become synonymous.

A DIR-like diver is compliment, just like the phrase,"MAC-like" is. Who
thinks "Windows-like" is a compliment? No one. It just happens to be the
lowest common denominator that everyone else uses because, well, everyone
else uses it.

MAC and DIR, two systems of excellence that only the most discriminating and
intelligent use! <g>

Was this a diving or computer list? :-/

Later,

JoeL

Look at:

http://www.execpc.com/~rjohnson/ics/features/cost.html

And this long 1996 article that is still relevant and things are even better
today:

http://www.planetcast.com/mac-ammo/ammo/FrankPetrie1.html


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]