Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
That's the answer. At 08:37 PM 5/8/2000 -0400, Trey wrote: >Joel, do you still have the 7 th degree black belt, and are you still >teaching Karate? > >Kevin Connell wrote: > > > > LoeJ: > > > > The answer to your question is, no, HID probably will not improve zero viz. > > > > Oh, yeah, and Fuck Off. > > > > At 06:24 PM 5/8/2000 -0500, you wrote: > > >on 5/8/00 5:17 PM, Trey at trey@ne*.co* wrote: > > > > > > > Joel, these things just have a higher frequency, shorter wavelenth so > > > > they penetrate further through water, as could be expected from any > > > > light at that end of the spectrum. The result is that you can "see" > > > > further in its beam, and the particulate does not backscatter so badly > > > > as with lower frequencies and longer wavelengths. > > > > > > > > As Dr Rose and the Trout suggest, this is why we use them in Leon Sinks > > > > and Weenikulla. > > > > > > > > HID is basicly ultra violet. > > > > > >Trey, > > > > > >And as I was asking Trout et al, the point is not that they will allow one > > >to see in zero-vis conditions, as has been suggested, but that they > improve > > >vis in low-vis conditions beyond that of a normal lighting system. Would > > >that be accurate? > > > > > >Later, > > > > > >JoeL > > > > ---------------------------------- > > Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> > > > > NW Labor Systems, Inc > > http://www.nwls.com > > > > ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> NW Labor Systems, Inc http://www.nwls.com ----------------------------------
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]