Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01BFA89A.9E8353E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, don't even begin to think I've forgotten about you, or that I will = just disappear if you ignore me (you wish it was that easy don't you). = The fact is Tom, I haven't even started yet, and until you come clean an = answer my ethics complaints with "facts", instead of your spin doctored = bullshit, I'm going to be your worst F'en nightmare pal. =20 Tom Mount wrote: <If you still are not satisfied I will give you the entire BOA contacts = and you can get everyones opnion but I think it will be about the same. Especially as some of your actions most likely would be considered as = well . You know the old kittle and pot return> Tom, I feel that the members who pay dues to your organization and = support IANTD have a right to know what the "old pot and kettle in = return" policy that you and your board of advisors are employing really = is. After all, "you" do advertise your agency for it's "renowned = attitude, standards,.....ethics" and so-forth in international diving = magazines, so please explain to us "all" what the above statement that = you made means. Most especially "the old pot and kettle return" policy = !! Is this what is considered a fair and impartial review within your = agency Tom??? Tom, I think you just proved to everyone how IANTD truly = conducts themselves (does Kangaroo/Good Ole Boy court ring a bell). It = is a shame that "YOU" and your agency pass judgement in such a fashion. = So what if I called Stone's goat roping at Wakulla 2 a accident waiting = to happen, and then he proved me right with a dead Nobel Peace Prize = Winner. I wish it never happened, and I feel sorry for the family, but = you can't say I didn't try to stop it, how about you? What did you do = other than cheer them on? This also has no bearing on the ethics = complaint that I have just filed with you, and you know it. It's to bad = that "you" and your organization conduct themselves based on other = peoples beliefs and/or affiliations, rather than by merit alone like = real men do. I talked to Lamar just like you said you did (the BOA = member you keep referring me to) but I also put the shoe on his foot, = and once he wore it for a minute, he said that he would not only go = after Rennakers instructors license, but that he would also take him to = court. Tom, I am going to court with Rennaker, and your agency, IANTD = "will also be included" along with the NSS/CDS unless you "wake-up" and = do the right thing. Your not pulling the wool over nobody's eyes on this = one when you say I got a fair and impartial review (look at your last = statement). Tom, "you" and your little traveling muppet show really = don't want me to expose you to the rest of the world for what you truly = are, and unless I get Rennaker's, and now Jone's head on a stick, "YOU" = know I will follow through. Yea, yea, I also know your private good ole = boy policy, the small talk on the internet doesn't mean much, and who = cares about court right? Well Tom, you have never even seen "my rules of = engagement" (George is way to nice to you), and unless you come forward = with a honest, and "public" reply to the above, you will witness them = first hand (i.e. I can afford more add space than you ever dreamed of). = =20 Bruic ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01BFA89A.9E8353E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Tom, don't even begin to think I've forgotten about you, or that I = will=20 just disappear if you ignore me (you wish it was that easy don't = you). The=20 fact is Tom, I haven't even started yet, and until you come clean an = answer my=20 ethics complaints with "facts", instead of your spin doctored bullshit, = I'm=20 going to be your worst F'en nightmare pal. =20 <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Mount wrote:<BR><BR><If you still are not satisfied I = will give=20 you the entire BOA contacts and<BR>you can get everyones opnion but I = think it=20 will be about the same.<BR>Especially as some of your actions most = likely would=20 be considered as well .<BR>You know the old kittle and pot = return></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV>Tom, I feel that the members who pay dues to your organization = and=20 support IANTD have a right to know what the "old pot and kettle in = return"=20 policy that you and your board of advisors are employing really is. = After=20 all, "you" do advertise your agency for it's "renowned attitude,=20 standards,.....ethics" and so-forth in international diving magazines, = so please=20 explain to us "all" what the above statement that you made = means. Most=20 especially "the old pot and kettle return" policy !! Is this what is = considered=20 a fair and impartial review within your agency Tom??? Tom, I think you = just=20 proved to everyone how IANTD truly conducts themselves (does = Kangaroo/Good Ole=20 Boy court ring a bell). It is a shame that "YOU" and your agency = pass=20 judgement in such a fashion. So what if I called Stone's goat = roping at=20 Wakulla 2 a accident waiting to happen, and then he proved me right with = a dead=20 Nobel Peace Prize Winner. I wish it never happened, and I feel sorry for = the=20 family, but you can't say I didn't try to stop it, how about you? What = did you=20 do other than cheer them on? This also has no bearing on the ethics = complaint that I have just filed with you, and you know it. It's to bad = that=20 "you" and your organization conduct themselves based on other peoples = beliefs=20 and/or affiliations, rather than by merit alone like real men do. I = talked to=20 Lamar just like you said you did (the BOA member you keep referring me = to) but I=20 also put the shoe on his foot, and once he wore it for a minute, he = said=20 that he would not only go after Rennakers instructors license, but that = he=20 would also take him to court. Tom, I am going to court with = Rennaker, and=20 your agency, IANTD "will also be included" along with the NSS/CDS unless = you=20 "wake-up" and do the right thing. Your not pulling the wool over = nobody's eyes=20 on this one when you say I got a fair and impartial review (look at your = last=20 statement). Tom, "you" and your little traveling muppet show = really=20 don't want me to expose you to the rest of the world for what you truly = are, and=20 unless I get Rennaker's, and now Jone's head on a stick, "YOU" = know I will=20 follow through. Yea, yea, I also know your private good ole = boy=20 policy, the small talk on the internet doesn't mean much, and who = cares=20 about court right? Well Tom, you have never even seen "my rules of = engagement"=20 (George is way to nice to you), and unless you come forward with a = honest, and=20 "public" reply to the above, you will witness them first hand (i.e. I = can afford=20 more add space than you ever dreamed of). </DIV> <DIV><BR>Bruic<BR><BR><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY>&l t;/HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01BFA89A.9E8353E0--
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]