Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Nor is the process for coating emulsion on film, Kodak uses or any of the machinery in the coating alleys in up state NY. Or the 3 million lines of code I use to reconstruct MRI imagining. Joe >From: "Kevin Connell" <kevin@nw*.co*> >To: "Mark G." <markg@pa*.ne*>, Technical Diving Mailing List ><techdiver@aq*.co*>, Cave Diving Mailing List ><cavers@cavers.com> >Subject: RE: JOHNS SCUBA >Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:09:12 -0800 > >Precisely! > >The secret recipe for coke? Not patented folks. And secret corporate >business processes aren't patented. > >And as an aside, patent law was written when 7 years wasn't a >technologically long time, and the side affect *was* to allow the public to >benefit from public record of invention. With most high tech stuff now, 7 >years of patent is 10 times the useful life of the technology. > >At 11:51 AM 3/29/2000 -0800, Mark G. wrote: > >> > >> > Patent law is written to protect the public. >> >>Not true; The constitution, where our patent system was born, says in >>article 1, section 8 "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, >>by >>securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to >>their respective Writings and Discoveries"; there is nothing about >>protecting anyone but the inventors, and this is done in exchange for them >>promoting their ideas, i.e.. making them public so the rest of society can >>benefit. Note that if you conceal the idea, you will most likely not be >>able to patent it. >> >> >Patent holders have >> > no right to >> > stop you from using their invention. They only have the right to >> > charge you a >> > license fee. >> >>Also not true; injunction is a standard remedy and you would be prohibited >>from making, using, selling, importing etc. the infringing product. A fee >>is not even a remedy going forward, only looking back for past >>infringement >>(because you cannot change the past and give a retroactive injunction) >> > >> > What the rate of that fee is must be negotiated but if you think >> > the patent >> > holder is asking too much you can take it to court. >> >>Not true; you cannot "take it (the fee) to court" , but you can seek to >>invalidate the patent or prove non infringement, which results in no fee >>paid. If you lose, the court/jury will decide the reasonable royalty, >>HOWEVER, this will be only for PAST infringement, and you will most likely >>get an injunction for the future. And if you knew you infringed and did >>it >>anyway because you didn't like their fee, you may get TRIPLE damages >>depending upon the judge (it is proscribed in the law that he can award up >>to triple the damages for willful infringement). >> >> > >> > If a patent holder does not build a device themselves or license >> > it, they can >> > lose their patent rights. >> >>This is not true; read the constitution quote above. there is nothing >>about >>this in the United States law, and it is totally legal to exclude others >>even if you don't build it yourself. See Injunction discussion above. >>Patent law in general doesn't care what you do; note it does not even >>ALLOW >>you do to ANYTHING EXCEPT exclude others from practicing your invention. >>Just because you have a patent does not allow you to practice the >>invention >>if others have patents on your product. >> >> > >> > In most cases like this competitors don't want to be seen as >> > having to use their >> > competitors' technology or they simply don't want to pay the money for >>a >> > license. >> >>Just about everyone in high tech uses each others patents; no way to avoid >>it. We all license what we can, and fight where we cant. I just >>completed >>a two year series of litigations Monday which cost about $20M in legal >>fees, >>where I had to teach the other company a lesson they wont soon forget >>about >>patent law. They lost their best patents to us, and their licensing >>program >>was devastated all because they "didn't want to be seen having to use >>their >>competitors technology". Go figure >> >>Mark >> >> > >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Rick Fincher >> > Thunderbird Technologies, Inc. >> > rnf@tb*.co* >> > >> > -- >> > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aq*.co*'. >> > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to >>`techdiver-request@aq*.co*'. > > >---------------------------------- > Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> > > NW Labor Systems, Inc > http://www.nwls.com > > Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest. > (A thing is only worth what someone else > is willing to pay for it) > >---------------------------------- > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]