I need some excerpts to search my mailboxes for and find out where they are, although I found a few gems: http://www.nwls.com/list-archive/reademail.asp?id=24266 http://www.nwls.com/list-archive/reademail.asp?id=12786 Or, *Warning* - *Coke Alert* http://www.nwls.com/list-archive/reademail.asp?id=24266 At 03:01 PM 2/3/2000 -0500, John Clark wrote: >You are missing the best Mr Clark posts for some reason. Also missing >are the "best of Rennaker" and some of the other farm animals. I can not >belive that "irvine" is most popular - everyone hates him, and "Mr >Clark" is so much funnier. > > >Kevin Connell wrote: > > > > Well, the archives had a fairly busy first day. > > > > The first search was, of course, a search for "From: mrclark", and the > > second, of course, "bonesmuggler" which, actually did not get in there > > until I reimported the "Cavers@geek.com" messages last night at about > 8PM PST > > > > The most popular is "From: irvine", and actually it looks like people are > > mostly searching for their own messages. 'Course, that's the first thing I > > did, too. > > > > Anyway, I've made some fixes, and I still have to get the old > > "techdiver@te*.ne*" messages in there. Have fun. Search on. > > > > http://www.nwls.com/list-archive > > > > ---------------------------------- > > Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> > > > > NW Labor Systems, Inc > > http://www.nwls.com > > > > How much extra bandwidth would we > > have if we didn't have these stupid > > signatures, anyway? > > > > ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> NW Labor Systems, Inc http://www.nwls.com How much extra bandwidth would we have if we didn't have these stupid signatures, anyway? ----------------------------------
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]