Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
No way dude the question was Why. I gave some of the more obvious reasons as to Why. I did not ask Barry to fix my light, Barry took my light and fixed it because he is just that kind of a Man.. This is chest pounding? I dont think so. These are simply statements that are "Matter of Fact" I have no qualm's about who anybody on this list buys their gear from. I have bought my share of inferior equipment and if I can help steer anyone away from making a bad choice with a purchase you can bet I will, Because I Am a Cave Diver. Enough said I am off to med I co At 08:33 PM 1/22/99 -0500, you wrote: >I really shouldn't bother responding to this but....... I don't thing i said >anything bad about barrys lights, JJ is one of the finest instructors and >people i've ever had the pleasure of meeting. I've never tried applied or >considered selling Barrys lights (not because of any quality issue) I have >more than enough lighting products here, My only objection was what you just >did, just pound, ours is bigger, fatter stronger ( sounds like a locker room >discussion). If somebody (there was finaly a decent post) would have said in >logical, read laymans terms, we think Barrys product is best because of >................................................. with a little substance >and information included it would have been an enjoyable post. We all >support our friends in there endevors in life, but really information is >what was requested. Not a chevys and fords statement, build a case, present >it, back up your information with data and you win. Were i was raised fuck >you is only good to start fights that never solve anything. Bill >-----Original Message----- >From: Scarabin, Brent <BrentScarabin@ne*.co*> >To: William Allen <william@ca*.co*>; Scott Landon ><js_landon@ho*.co*>; submrge@wo*.at*.ne* ><submrge@wo*.at*.ne*>; cavers@cavers.com <cavers@cavers.com> >Date: Thursday, January 21, 1999 9:20 PM >Subject: Re: I need a new light.... > > >>At 04:51 AM 1/22/99 -0500, William Allen wrote: >>>Geez and with that commercial message from the wkpp for another wkpp's >>>members product I hope we can end the advertising day. Couldn't you guys >>>just say "I'm a wkpp member we support the business's of ou >> >> Nah, but we can say "FUCK YOU". You are definitely not one to talk about >>marketing abuse on this list. >> >>Sour Grapes maybe. JJ and Barry will not let you peddle their light on your >>page. I know AJ makes a decent light, but the initial question was compare >>the AUL Spec 100 to the Extreme Exposure Explorer 14 or Pro 14. Stand the >>AUL and the EE side by side, and it will be readily apparent which is the >>superior light. You can't argue with that, regardless of who makes it. I >>will not even get into the service and support issues. >>I don't walk around routinely hammering my lights either, but if you have >>ever been in rough seas...... "forget about it". And yes, you definitely >>need a clear cannister when diving an AUL ;) >>BTW, it is rather obvious Arnold didn't father your dog, one kick and all >>the sorry mutts legs would have fallen off. And I don't put him in one of >>AJ's housings unless your planning on bathing the smelly bastard. >> >> > >
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]