Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:56:27 -0500
From: KVI <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
Organization: DIR
To: Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*>
CC: techdive@ea*.ne*, cavers <cavers@cavers.com>, techdiver@aq*.co*,
     Peter Clarke ,
     "\"John R. Rose\"" ,
     "\"Jesse Armantrout\"" ,
     "\"Ken Sallot\"" ,
     Jeff Bentley ,
     "\"Chris Werner\""
Subject: Re: Listen Up Walker - wasRe: More USDCTisms
Bill, you are dealing with the village ignoramus here. This guy and his
TDI/IANTD buddies spend full time worrying about me, and they should. We
are going to force these low lifes to change all of their standards, and
have been sucessful so far in all but eliminating their ridiculous deep
air and other atrocities.

What will be impossible to eliminate are the legions of obvious mental
defectives like Walker who would be roofing or cutting lawns if it were
not for "tec" diving "instruction".

This guy is so stupid. It would be funny were it not for the track
record of the others like him - good point that you made on this. I will
say I am getting really sick of hearing about retarded morons like this
constantly discussing me and badmouthing me armed with "information"
from that ridiculous loudmouth Gilliam. By he way, I do not know
anything about Gilliam pot smoking ( other than what he brags about in
print, but then how can you believe him?), but I hear he is no longer
"CEO" of Uwatec. Maybe this boat monkee Walker can explain how the fat
slob managed to lose that job. Maybe it had something to do with this
kind of crap spreading, and other such behavior, and maybe that idiot
Walker can tell us all what a great guy this is, and how he has done so
much for diving, like empower boat monkee yard men like Walker to ruin
diving for all of us.


Bill Mee wrote:
> 
> John Walker Wrote:
> 
> >Congradulations to Mr. Rose for his doctrine but I am appolled my his
> >tatletail like approach in his previous post.
> ………………….
> >I feel compelled to point out that on more than a few
> >occasions they have posted lies about most anyone who dares to debate
> >them or does not directly follow in their phylisophical footsteps.
> …………………….
> >He/they have even gone so far as to edit personal e-mail in
> >hopes of presenting a new inturpitation to the techdiver list.
> 
> >They call Brett Gilliam a pot smoker. Were is their prof that
> >he smokes pot. If
> 
> >They cry foul wene someone impersonates George calling for legal
> >repercussions. I-fucking-ronic!
> 
> >he is full of shit and knows nothing about me or my phylosophy, diving or
> >not,
> 
> John,
> 
> For the most part I have sat idly by and chosen to avoid you in the same way
> as I avoid making eye contact with vagrants and the mentally unbalanced.
> Unfortunately, your profane and incoherent liturgy of invective and
> profanity has overwhelmed my otherwise tolerant disposition.  Add to this a
> disturbing stream of personal insults directed at my close friends and
> colleagues and you can begin to appreciate my displeasure with the likes of
> your self.
> 
> Your most recent posting and another directed at Peter Clark are a prima
> facie example of a personality in deep turmoil.  I went back and read and
> reread your posting and can only say that you sound bitter and depressed.
> Perhaps this is a consequence of the slackening of business during the off
> diving season. Perhaps it is not.
> .
> None of this would make any difference in the slightest if you were simply
> John Doe; however it is appalling to me that you are a so called “technical”
> diving instructor empowered with the ability to potentially kill someone.
> We have witnessed several instructional deaths and potential deaths during
> the past year where the instructor’s personality, mental state and
> intelligence quotient  possibly played a role in the tragedies. Your near
> complete inability to comprehend even the trivially simple DIR system is
> very disturbing.  The problem is compounded by your continued attempts to
> reinterpret this system along with an argumentative, insulting and nasty
> attitude
> 
> I am confident that my friends in the WKKP as well as many of the competent
> people on this list would be pleased to politely debate you on the issues.
> When you reward them with an irrational and antagonistic outburst you
> dissuade most from any form of normal discussion.  Furthermore, you must not
> confuse the occasional use of hyperbole with personal antagonism.
> 
> Why don’t attempt being pleasant for a change.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bill Mee


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]