Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <pbsmith@ma*.ha*.co*>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:24 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re[2]: Richie: Yes or No?
To: NHanke@ao*.co*, deepreef@bi*.or*, wwm@sa*.ne*,
     armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*
Cc: kirvine@sa*.ne*, bruce@tr*.co*, techdiver@aq*.co*,
     rebreather@nw*.co*, HoustonCaveDivers@ca*.co*,
     freeattic@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*, cavers@cavers.com

     By the way, Troutie, Pinkie says to tell you your account is in arrears...
     
     PBS


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Richie: Yes or No?
Author:  armantrout@wo*.at*.ne* at uuencode
Date:    12/16/1998 6:29 AM


But Noreen, we all know your definition of a good man is how much he pays 
you for sex, and we also know that richie has no dough.
     
Trout
     
-----Original Message-----
From: NHanke@ao*.co* <NHanke@ao*.co*>
To: deepreef@bi*.or* <deepreef@bi*.or*>; wwm@sa*.ne* 
<wwm@sa*.ne*>
Cc: armantrout@wo*.at*.ne* <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; 
kirvine@sa*.ne* <kirvine@sa*.ne*>; bruce@tr*.co* 
<bruce@tr*.co*>; techdiver@aq*.co* <techdiver@aq*.co*>; 
rebreather@nw*.co* <rebreather@nw*.co*>; 
HoustonCaveDivers@ca*.co* <HoustonCaveDivers@ca*.co*>; 
freeattic@co*.ci*.uf*.ed* <freeattic@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*>; 
cavers@cavers.com <cavers@cavers.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 12:39 AM 
Subject: Re: Richie: Yes or No?
     
     
>THIS POST SAYS IT ALL!   Honesty, integrity and a desire to help you out 
with
>your issue... without flagellating you.   When you "boys" learn how to be 
this
>away.... you can piss with Pyle!  Sure is sad it takes SO MANY DIMWITS to 
try
>to bring down one good man in all these posts. 
>
>Disgusted,
>Noreen
>
>In a message dated 12/16/98 12:14:12 AM, deepreef@bi*.or* writes: 
>
>>Good questions.  I can HONESTLY say that I don't know the answers to any 
>>of them, except I'm almost certain the answer to #1 is "Closed Circuit". 
>>I'm also pretty sure the answer to #5 is "Yes", but I'm not certain. 
>>I've forwarded them on to someone who might be able to provide more 
>>definitive and detailed answers.  Meanwhile, I have to catch a plane in 
>>a
>>few hours, and my rebreather isn't even packed yet, and Lisa and I are 
>>going to take Cara to see "A Bug's Life" before she drops me off at the 
>>airport, so I'll have to suspend my participation in the festivities until 
>>Sunday, when I get back.
>>
>>Take care,
>>
>>Aloha,
>>Rich
>>



RFC-822-headers:
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by mail.hac.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #26580)
 id <0F4200J01AWDU7@ma*.ha*.co*> for "patrick b smith"@uuencode.mail.hac.com;
 Wed, 16 Dec 1998 06:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fw-es05.hac.com by mail.hac.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #26580)
 with ESMTP id <0F4200I5EAWCMY@ma*.ha*.co*> for
 "patrick b smith"@uuencode.mail.hac.com; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 06:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nwdesigns.nwdesigns.com ([198.175.11.25])
 by fw-es05.hac.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id GAA14764 for
 <pbsmith@cc*.ha*.co*>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 06:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (unverified [204.127.131.36])
 by nwdesigns.nwdesigns.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 2.1.2)
 with SMTP id <B0000194862@nw*.nw*.co*> for
 <rebreather@nw*.co*>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:07:11 -0500
Received: from uymfdlvk ([12.74.69.202]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
 (InterMail v03.02.05 118 121 101)
 with SMTP id <19981216143025.ETPH18674@uy*>; Wed,
 16 Dec 1998 14:30:25 +0000
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:29:34 -0600
From: Jess Armantrout <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>
Subject: Re: Richie: Yes or No?
Sender: rebreather-request@nw*.co*
Message-id: <000601be2900$8bb84240$ca454a0c@uy*>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Priority: 3

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]