Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:42:44 -0400
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
From: Steven Lindblom <s_lindblom@co*.co*>
Subject: Re: Hydro + tanks
Interesting. According to most accounts, the plus sign was a wartime 
stopgap conceived of in 1942 as a way of increasing tank capacity, 
and kept on afterwards when no problems were found running the tanks 
at the higher pressure. So those 1929-1941 hydros are interesting 
anachronisms, to say the least.

Re plus ratings in general, there are, best I can tell, three kinds 
of dive/hydro shops: shops that don't understand the plus rating and 
will tell you flatly they don't do it, shops that don't understand it 
but pretend they do, and shops that understand it and do it all the 
time. The middle are, pretty obviously, the most dangerous as they'll 
say things like "We'll do it if we can" or "We'll try" then the tanks 
will come back without the plus and they'll mumble something about 
"we checked and the regs don't allow it". Shops that do it routinely 
are usually pretty no-nonesens and straightforward about it when one 
asks, any slight hesitation or prevarication on their part and its 
best to go elsewhere. Another good test is that most shops will have 
some tanks istting around that have been hydroed and are waiting to 
be picked up at the shop, if none of them have the plus its a bad 
sign.





>Al is quite correct. I just got 4 LP95's and an K helium bottle back from
>hydro yesterday and all plus rated. The K bottle's manufacturer hydro is
>February of 1924 and it has been plus rated every hydro since then!
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]